Internal Trauma Fixation Device Market Report by Product (Closure Device, Bone Cement), Material (Stainless Steel, Nitinol, Titanium, Tritium, Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK)), End User (Hospitals, Orthopedic Surgical Centers, Trauma Centers, Ambulatory Cen

Internal Trauma Fixation Device Market Report by Product (Closure Device, Bone Cement), Material (Stainless Steel, Nitinol, Titanium, Tritium, Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK)), End User (Hospitals, Orthopedic Surgical Centers, Trauma Centers, Ambulatory Centers), and Region 2024-2032


The global internal trauma fixation device market size reached US$ 10.2 Billion in 2023. Looking forward, IMARC Group expects the market to reach US$ 15.3 Billion by 2032, exhibiting a growth rate (CAGR) of 4.5% during 2024-2032.

Internal trauma fixation devices refer to the biologically inert medical tools implanted for the stabilization of fractured bones in the body. Some of the commonly used devices include cannulated screws, intramedullary nails, hip screws, cables, wires, plates and pins. They are manufactured using stainless steel, tritium, nitinol, polyether ether ketone (PEEK), nickel and titanium and are corrosion resistant and adjustable according to the bone structure. They aid in maintaining the original shape of the bone and facilitate repair by restricting the movement of fractured bones. As a result, they are widely used across hospitals, orthopedic surgical centers and trauma and ambulatory centers.

Internal Trauma Fixation Device Market Trends:

The increasing prevalence of orthopedic disorders, along with the rising geriatric population across the globe, is one of the key factors driving the growth of the market. Moreover, the rising incidence of road accidents and sports-related injuries are providing a thrust to the market growth. The internal trauma fixation devices are widely used for elderly patients, which are more prone to fractures and joint dislocation due to osteoporosis and other bone-related disorders. This has further led to the increasing adoption of biocompatible, elastic and fatigue and kink-resistant closure devices, which is also contributing to the market growth. In line with this, the increasing adoption of minimally invasive (MI) surgical procedures for the placement of internal trauma fixation devices is favoring the growth of the market. Additionally, various innovations in implant technologies and the development of cement-augmented transiliacal internal fixators are acting as other growth-inducing factors. These devices provide improved stabilization of fractures in the pelvis. Other factors, including the rising healthcare expenditure capacities of the masses, along with extensive research and development (R&D) activities, are anticipated to drive the market toward growth.

Key Market Segmentation:

IMARC Group provides an analysis of the key trends in each sub-segment of the global internal trauma fixation device market report, along with forecasts at the global, regional and country level from 2024-2032. Our report has categorized the market based on product, material and end user.

Breakup by Product:
  • Closure Device
  • Plates and Screws
  • Wires
  • Clips and Pins
  • Rods and Nails
  • Cables
  • Bone Cement
Breakup by Material:
  • Stainless Steel
  • Nitinol
  • Titanium
  • Tritium
  • Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK)
Breakup by End User:
  • Hospitals
  • Orthopedic Surgical Centers
  • Trauma Centers
  • Ambulatory Centers
Breakup by Region:
  • North America
  • United States
  • Canada
  • Asia-Pacific
  • China
  • Japan
  • India
  • South Korea
  • Australia
  • Indonesia
  • Others
  • Europe
  • Germany
  • France
  • United Kingdom
  • Italy
  • Spain
  • Russia
  • Others
  • Latin America
  • Brazil
  • Mexico
  • Others
  • Middle East and Africa
Competitive Landscape:

The competitive landscape of the industry has also been examined along with the profiles of the key players being Arthrex Inc., B. Braun Melsungen AG, Globus Medical Inc., Johnson & Johnson Private Limited, Medartis AG, Orthofix Medical Inc., Orthopaedic Implant Company, OsteoMed (Berkshire Hathaway Inc.), Smith & Nephew plc, Stryker Corporation and Zimmer Biomet.

Key Questions Answered in This Report

1. How big is the global internal trauma fixation device market?

2. What is the expected growth rate of the global internal trauma fixation device market during 2024-2032?

3. What are the key factors driving the global internal trauma fixation device market?

4. What has been the impact of COVID-19 on the global internal trauma fixation device market?

5. What is the breakup of the global internal trauma fixation device market based on the product?

6. What is the breakup of the global internal trauma fixation device market based on the material?

7. What is the breakup of the global internal trauma fixation device market based on the end user?

8. What are the key regions in the global internal trauma fixation device market?

9. Who are the key players/companies in the global internal trauma fixation device market?


1 Preface
2 Scope and Methodology
2.1 Objectives of the Study
2.2 Stakeholders
2.3 Data Sources
2.3.1 Primary Sources
2.3.2 Secondary Sources
2.4 Market Estimation
2.4.1 Bottom-Up Approach
2.4.2 Top-Down Approach
2.5 Forecasting Methodology
3 Executive Summary
4 Introduction
4.1 Overview
4.2 Key Industry Trends
5 Global Internal Trauma Fixation Device Market
5.1 Market Overview
5.2 Market Performance
5.3 Impact of COVID-19
5.4 Market Forecast
6 Market Breakup by Product
6.1 Closure Device
6.1.1 Market Trends
6.1.2 Key Segments
6.1.2.1 Plates and Screws
6.1.2.2 Wires
6.1.2.3 Clips and Pins
6.1.2.4 Rods and Nails
6.1.2.5 Cables
6.1.3 Market Forecast
6.2 Bone Cement
6.2.1 Market Trends
6.2.2 Market Forecast
7 Market Breakup by Material
7.1 Stainless Steel
7.1.1 Market Trends
7.1.2 Market Forecast
7.2 Nitinol
7.2.1 Market Trends
7.2.2 Market Forecast
7.3 Titanium
7.3.1 Market Trends
7.3.2 Market Forecast
7.4 Tritium
7.4.1 Market Trends
7.4.2 Market Forecast
7.5 Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK)
7.5.1 Market Trends
7.5.2 Market Forecast
8 Market Breakup by End User
8.1 Hospitals
8.1.1 Market Trends
8.1.2 Market Forecast
8.2 Orthopedic Surgical Centers
8.2.1 Market Trends
8.2.2 Market Forecast
8.3 Trauma Centers
8.3.1 Market Trends
8.3.2 Market Forecast
8.4 Ambulatory Centers
8.4.1 Market Trends
8.4.2 Market Forecast
9 Market Breakup by Region
9.1 North America
9.1.1 United States
9.1.1.1 Market Trends
9.1.1.2 Market Forecast
9.1.2 Canada
9.1.2.1 Market Trends
9.1.2.2 Market Forecast
9.2 Asia-Pacific
9.2.1 China
9.2.1.1 Market Trends
9.2.1.2 Market Forecast
9.2.2 Japan
9.2.2.1 Market Trends
9.2.2.2 Market Forecast
9.2.3 India
9.2.3.1 Market Trends
9.2.3.2 Market Forecast
9.2.4 South Korea
9.2.4.1 Market Trends
9.2.4.2 Market Forecast
9.2.5 Australia
9.2.5.1 Market Trends
9.2.5.2 Market Forecast
9.2.6 Indonesia
9.2.6.1 Market Trends
9.2.6.2 Market Forecast
9.2.7 Others
9.2.7.1 Market Trends
9.2.7.2 Market Forecast
9.3 Europe
9.3.1 Germany
9.3.1.1 Market Trends
9.3.1.2 Market Forecast
9.3.2 France
9.3.2.1 Market Trends
9.3.2.2 Market Forecast
9.3.3 United Kingdom
9.3.3.1 Market Trends
9.3.3.2 Market Forecast
9.3.4 Italy
9.3.4.1 Market Trends
9.3.4.2 Market Forecast
9.3.5 Spain
9.3.5.1 Market Trends
9.3.5.2 Market Forecast
9.3.6 Russia
9.3.6.1 Market Trends
9.3.6.2 Market Forecast
9.3.7 Others
9.3.7.1 Market Trends
9.3.7.2 Market Forecast
9.4 Latin America
9.4.1 Brazil
9.4.1.1 Market Trends
9.4.1.2 Market Forecast
9.4.2 Mexico
9.4.2.1 Market Trends
9.4.2.2 Market Forecast
9.4.3 Others
9.4.3.1 Market Trends
9.4.3.2 Market Forecast
9.5 Middle East and Africa
9.5.1 Market Trends
9.5.2 Market Breakup by Country
9.5.3 Market Forecast
10 SWOT Analysis
10.1 Overview
10.2 Strengths
10.3 Weaknesses
10.4 Opportunities
10.5 Threats
11 Value Chain Analysis
12 Porters Five Forces Analysis
12.1 Overview
12.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
12.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
12.4 Degree of Competition
12.5 Threat of New Entrants
12.6 Threat of Substitutes
13 Price Analysis
14 Competitive Landscape
14.1 Market Structure
14.2 Key Players
14.3 Profiles of Key Players
14.3.1 Arthrex Inc.
14.3.1.1 Company Overview
14.3.1.2 Product Portfolio
14.3.1.3 SWOT Analysis
14.3.2 B. Braun Melsungen AG
14.3.2.1 Company Overview
14.3.2.2 Product Portfolio
14.3.2.3 SWOT Analysis
14.3.3 Globus Medical Inc.
14.3.3.1 Company Overview
14.3.3.2 Product Portfolio
14.3.3.3 Financials
14.3.3.4 SWOT Analysis
14.3.4 Johnson & Johnson Private Limited
14.3.4.1 Company Overview
14.3.4.2 Product Portfolio
14.3.4.3 Financials
14.3.4.4 SWOT Analysis
14.3.5 Medartis AG
14.3.5.1 Company Overview
14.3.5.2 Product Portfolio
14.3.6 Orthofix Medical Inc.
14.3.6.1 Company Overview
14.3.6.2 Product Portfolio
14.3.6.3 Financials
14.3.6.4 SWOT Analysis
14.3.7 Orthopaedic Implant Company
14.3.7.1 Company Overview
14.3.7.2 Product Portfolio
14.3.8 OsteoMed (Berkshire Hathaway Inc.)
14.3.8.1 Company Overview
14.3.8.2 Product Portfolio
14.3.9 Smith & Nephew plc
14.3.9.1 Company Overview
14.3.9.2 Product Portfolio
14.3.9.3 Financials
14.3.9.4 SWOT Analysis
14.3.10 Stryker Corporation
14.3.10.1 Company Overview
14.3.10.2 Product Portfolio
14.3.10.3 Financials
14.3.10.4 SWOT Analysis
14.3.11 Zimmer Biomet
14.3.11.1 Company Overview
14.3.11.2 Product Portfolio
14.3.11.3 Financials
14.3.11.4 SWOT Analysis

Download our eBook: How to Succeed Using Market Research

Learn how to effectively navigate the market research process to help guide your organization on the journey to success.

Download eBook
Cookie Settings