Structural Health Monitoring Market Forecasts to 2030 – Global Analysis By Component (Hardware, Software and Other Components), Type (Wired Systems and Wireless Systems), Implementation Method, Application, End User and By Geography

Structural Health Monitoring Market Forecasts to 2030 – Global Analysis By Component (Hardware, Software and Other Components), Type (Wired Systems and Wireless Systems), Implementation Method, Application, End User and By Geography


According to Stratistics MRC, the Global Structural Health Monitoring Market is accounted for $3.14 billion in 2023 and is expected to reach $11.79 billion by 2030 growing at a CAGR of 20.8% during the forecast period. Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) is a proactive approach to assessing the condition of infrastructure such as bridges, buildings, and pipelines in real-time or periodically. It involves the use of sensors, data analysis techniques, and predictive algorithms to detect damage, degradation, or abnormalities in structures. By continuously monitoring key parameters like strain, vibration, and temperature, SHM aims to identify potential issues before they escalate, thereby enhancing safety, reducing maintenance costs, and extending the lifespan of assets. SHM systems can be wired or wireless, and they provide valuable insights into structural performance, aiding in informed decision-making for maintenance and repairs. Its applications range from civil engineering to aerospace, offering a comprehensive solution for ensuring the integrity and reliability of critical infrastructure.

According to Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), in the U.S., more than 30.0% of structures, including bridges and dams, have surpassed their 50 years of infrastructure design life.

Market Dynamics:

Driver:

Need for asset management

Asset management is a key driver of the structural health monitoring market due to its crucial role in optimizing the performance and longevity of infrastructure assets. By implementing SHM solutions, asset managers can proactively monitor the health and integrity of structures such as bridges, buildings, and dams in real-time. This proactive approach enables timely detection of structural issues, minimizes maintenance costs, and enhances safety. Additionally, SHM facilitates data-driven decision-making, enabling asset managers to prioritize repairs and allocate resources efficiently. Overall, integrating SHM into asset management strategies helps organizations ensure the reliability and resilience of their infrastructure assets.

Restraint:

Complexity

The complexity restraint refers to challenges arising from the intricate nature of implementing monitoring systems in diverse structural environments. This encompasses factors such as varying structural designs, material compositions, and operational conditions. Managing this complexity requires robust sensor technologies, sophisticated data analytics, and adaptable monitoring strategies. Additionally, integration with existing infrastructure and compatibility with different architectural styles add layers of intricacy. Overcoming these complexities demands innovative approaches, interdisciplinary collaboration, and continuous advancements in SHM technology to ensure accurate and reliable structural assessments.

Opportunity:

Emerging applications in aerospace and defense

SHM technology offers real-time monitoring of structural integrity, which is crucial for ensuring safety and efficiency in aerospace and defense operations. In these sectors, where even minor structural defects can have catastrophic consequences, SHM provides proactive maintenance, reducing downtime and maintenance costs. Moreover, with the growing complexity of aerospace structures and the increasing demand for autonomous systems, SHM plays a pivotal role in ensuring continuous operation and mission success. This presents a ripe market for advanced SHM solutions tailored to the unique requirements of aerospace and defense applications, fostering innovation and investment in the sector.

Threat:

High initial costs

The high initial cost threats are the significant upfront investment required to implement SHM systems. These costs encompass purchasing sensors, data acquisition systems, software, installation, and ongoing maintenance. For potential clients, especially in sectors like civil infrastructure or aerospace, these expenses can act as a barrier to adoption, deterring them from investing in SHM solutions despite their long-term benefits. Addressing this threat requires SHM providers to emphasize the cost-effectiveness and long-term savings of their systems, offer flexible pricing models, and continually innovate to lower the entry costs for prospective clients.

Covid-19 Impact:

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted the structural health monitoring market. Initially, there was a slowdown in projects due to supply chain disruptions and construction halts, leading to a dip in demand for SHM systems. However, as industries adapted to remote monitoring solutions, there emerged a heightened awareness of the importance of SHM in ensuring infrastructure safety. This awareness has driven investments in SHM technologies, particularly in sectors like transportation, energy, and civil engineering, as authorities seek to prevent future disruptions and ensure the resilience of critical infrastructure.

The software segment is expected to be the largest during the forecast period

The software segment within the structural health monitoring market has seen significant growth due to several factors. Advancements in sensor technology have led to an increase in data collection, necessitating sophisticated software solutions for processing and analysis. Additionally, the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms has enhanced the capabilities of SHM software in detecting and predicting structural issues with greater accuracy. Furthermore, as infrastructure ages and safety regulations become more stringent, the adoption of SHM software is expected to continue its upward trajectory.

The bridges and dams segment is expected to have the highest CAGR during the forecast period

The growth in the Bridges and Dams segment of the Structural Health Monitoring market is primarily driven by increasing concerns about the aging infrastructure worldwide. Governments and organizations are investing significantly in monitoring systems to ensure the safety and integrity of bridges and dams. Advanced sensor technologies, such as fiber optics and wireless systems, are being deployed to provide real-time data on the structural health of bridges and dams, leading to proactive maintenance and risk mitigation strategies. Additionally, the adoption of SHM solutions is being accelerated by stringent safety regulations and the need to minimize downtime and repair costs associated with structural failures.

Region with largest share:

The structural health monitoring market in North America has experienced significant growth due to increasing investments in infrastructure projects, such as bridges, dams, and buildings, which has driven the demand for SHM systems to ensure safety and longevity. Stringent regulations and standards regarding structural safety have propelled the adoption of SHM technologies across various industries. Additionally, advancements in sensor technology, data analytics, and wireless communication have made SHM systems more efficient and cost-effective, further fueling market expansion. Moreover, growing awareness about the benefits of predictive maintenance and real-time monitoring has encouraged organizations to invest in SHM solutions.

Region with highest CAGR:

The Asia-Pacific region has witnessed significant growth due to rapid urbanization and infrastructural development across countries like China, India, and Southeast Asian nations which led to increased demand for SHM systems to ensure the safety and integrity of buildings, bridges, and other critical infrastructure. Moreover, the region's susceptibility to natural disasters like earthquakes has heightened the need for advanced monitoring solutions, government initiatives focusing on enhancing infrastructure resilience and safety standards have further propelled market growth. The emergence of advanced technologies and the growing adoption of wireless sensor networks have also contributed to the expansion of the SHM market in the Asia Pacific.

Key players in the market

Some of the key players in Structural Health Monitoring market include Campbell Scientific, Inc., Cowi A/S, Digi-Texx, Geocomp, Inc., Geokon, GeoSIG Ltd, James Fisher and Sons plc., Kinemetrics, National Instruments Corp., Nova Ventures Group, Sixense, Structural Monitoring Systems Plc and Xylem.

Key Developments:

In April 2024, Xylem introduces new mobile technology that will help water utilities meet compliance requirements for emerging drinking water contaminants such as PFAS. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) passed new regulations for Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) for PFAS related contaminants in drinking water on April 10, 2024. Meeting new requirements can often lead to the implementation of new equipment. Xylem and Evoqua, now one company, have developed the MitiGATOR Mobile System that aims at filtering out new contaminants such as PFAS.

Components Covered:
• Hardware
• Software
• Service
• Other Components

Types Covered:
• Wired Systems
• Wireless Systems

Implementation Methods Covered:
• Retrofitting
• New Construction

Applications Covered:
• Airframes and Wind Turbines
• Bridges and Dams
• Building and Stadiums
• Large Machines and Equipment
• Vessels and Platforms
• Other Applications

End Users Covered:
• Mining
• Aerospace and Defense
• Civil Infrastructure
• Other End Users

Regions Covered:
• North America
US
Canada
Mexico
• Europe
Germany
UK
Italy
France
Spain
Rest of Europe
• Asia Pacific
Japan
China
India
Australia
New Zealand
South Korea
Rest of Asia Pacific
• South America
Argentina
Brazil
Chile
Rest of South America
• Middle East & Africa
Saudi Arabia
UAE
Qatar
South Africa
Rest of Middle East & Africa

What our report offers:
- Market share assessments for the regional and country-level segments
- Strategic recommendations for the new entrants
- Covers Market data for the years 2021, 2022, 2023, 2026, and 2030
- Market Trends (Drivers, Constraints, Opportunities, Threats, Challenges, Investment Opportunities, and recommendations)
- Strategic recommendations in key business segments based on the market estimations
- Competitive landscaping mapping the key common trends
- Company profiling with detailed strategies, financials, and recent developments
- Supply chain trends mapping the latest technological advancements


1 Executive Summary
2 Preface
2.1 Abstract
2.2 Stake Holders
2.3 Research Scope
2.4 Research Methodology
2.4.1 Data Mining
2.4.2 Data Analysis
2.4.3 Data Validation
2.4.4 Research Approach
2.5 Research Sources
2.5.1 Primary Research Sources
2.5.2 Secondary Research Sources
2.5.3 Assumptions
3 Market Trend Analysis
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Drivers
3.3 Restraints
3.4 Opportunities
3.5 Threats
3.6 Application Analysis
3.7 End User Analysis
3.8 Emerging Markets
3.9 Impact of Covid-19
4 Porters Five Force Analysis
4.1 Bargaining power of suppliers
4.2 Bargaining power of buyers
4.3 Threat of substitutes
4.4 Threat of new entrants
4.5 Competitive rivalry
5 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market, By Component
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Hardware
5.2.1 Data Acquisition Systems
5.2.2 Sensors
5.2.3 Other Hardwares
5.3 Software
5.3.1 Parameter Identification and Tracking
5.3.2 Design and Analysis
5.3.3 Other Softwares
5.4 Service
5.4.1 Design and Consulting Service
5.4.2 Installation Service
5.4.3 Operation and Maintenance Service
5.4.4 Other Services
5.5 Other Components
6 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market, By Type
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Wired Systems
6.3 Wireless Systems
7 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market, By Implementation Method
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Retrofitting
7.3 New Construction
8 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market, By Application
8.1 Introduction
8.2 Airframes and Wind Turbines
8.3 Bridges and Dams
8.4 Building and Stadiums
8.5 Large Machines and Equipment
8.6 Vessels and Platforms
8.7 Other Applications
9 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market, By End User
9.1 Introduction
9.2 Mining
9.3 Aerospace and Defense
9.4 Civil Infrastructure
9.5 Other End Users
10 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market, By Geography
10.1 Introduction
10.2 North America
10.2.1 US
10.2.2 Canada
10.2.3 Mexico
10.3 Europe
10.3.1 Germany
10.3.2 UK
10.3.3 Italy
10.3.4 France
10.3.5 Spain
10.3.6 Rest of Europe
10.4 Asia Pacific
10.4.1 Japan
10.4.2 China
10.4.3 India
10.4.4 Australia
10.4.5 New Zealand
10.4.6 South Korea
10.4.7 Rest of Asia Pacific
10.5 South America
10.5.1 Argentina
10.5.2 Brazil
10.5.3 Chile
10.5.4 Rest of South America
10.6 Middle East & Africa
10.6.1 Saudi Arabia
10.6.2 UAE
10.6.3 Qatar
10.6.4 South Africa
10.6.5 Rest of Middle East & Africa
11 Key Developments
11.1 Agreements, Partnerships, Collaborations and Joint Ventures
11.2 Acquisitions & Mergers
11.3 New Product Launch
11.4 Expansions
11.5 Other Key Strategies
12 Company Profiling
12.1 Campbell Scientific, Inc.
12.2 Cowi A/S
12.3 Digi-Texx
12.4 Geocomp, Inc.
12.5 Geokon
12.6 GeoSIG Ltd
12.7 James Fisher and Sons plc.
12.8 Kinemetrics
12.9 National Instruments Corp
12.10 Nova Ventures Group
12.11 Sixense
12.12 Structural Monitoring Systems Plc
12.13 Xylem
List of Tables
Table 1 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Region (2021-2030) ($MN)
Table 2 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Component (2021-2030) ($MN)
Table 3 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Hardware (2021-2030) ($MN)
Table 4 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Data Acquisition Systems (2021-2030) ($MN)
Table 5 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Sensors (2021-2030) ($MN)
Table 6 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Other Hardwares (2021-2030) ($MN)
Table 7 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Software (2021-2030) ($MN)
Table 8 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Parameter Identification and Tracking (2021-2030) ($MN)
Table 9 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Design and Analysis (2021-2030) ($MN)
Table 10 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Other Softwares (2021-2030) ($MN)
Table 11 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Service (2021-2030) ($MN)
Table 12 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Design and Consulting Service (2021-2030) ($MN)
Table 13 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Installation Service (2021-2030) ($MN)
Table 14 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Operation and Maintenance Service (2021-2030) ($MN)
Table 15 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Other Services (2021-2030) ($MN)
Table 16 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Other Components (2021-2030) ($MN)
Table 17 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Type (2021-2030) ($MN)
Table 18 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Wired Systems (2021-2030) ($MN)
Table 19 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Wireless Systems (2021-2030) ($MN)
Table 20 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Implementation Method (2021-2030) ($MN)
Table 21 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Retrofitting (2021-2030) ($MN)
Table 22 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By New Construction (2021-2030) ($MN)
Table 23 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Application (2021-2030) ($MN)
Table 24 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Airframes and Wind Turbines (2021-2030) ($MN)
Table 25 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Bridges and Dams (2021-2030) ($MN)
Table 26 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Building and Stadiums (2021-2030) ($MN)
Table 27 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Large Machines and Equipment (2021-2030) ($MN)
Table 28 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Vessels and Platforms (2021-2030) ($MN)
Table 29 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Other Applications (2021-2030) ($MN)
Table 30 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By End User (2021-2030) ($MN)
Table 31 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Energy (2021-2030) ($MN)
Table 32 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Mining (2021-2030) ($MN)
Table 33 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Aerospace and Defense (2021-2030) ($MN)
Table 34 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Civil Infrastructure (2021-2030) ($MN)
Table 35 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Other End Users (2021-2030) ($MN)
Note: Tables for North America, Europe, APAC, South America, and Middle East & Africa Regions are also represented in the same manner as above.

Download our eBook: How to Succeed Using Market Research

Learn how to effectively navigate the market research process to help guide your organization on the journey to success.

Download eBook
Cookie Settings