Pain Management Devices Market, Industry Trends and Global Forecasts, Till 2035
The Pain Management Devices Market is valued at USD 7.94 billion in 2024 and is anticipated to grow at a CAGR of 4.8 %, during the forecast period, till 2035.
Pain is a complex phenomenon involving unpleasant sensory experience, primarily associated with acute or chronic physical injury exacerbated by various psychological, biological, and social factors. The prevalence of pain is substantial, affecting a significant number of individuals globally. For instance, in Europe, chronic pain affects approximately 150 million individuals, equivalent to the combined population of France and Germany, leading to an annual economic burden of more than EUR 300 billion. Given the widespread prevalence of pain across various geographies, effective pain management solutions are crucial to improve patient outcomes and enhance the quality of life.
Pain management typically involves the use of pain management devices and therapies to alleviate the suffering of individuals with musculoskeletal pain, spinal and neuropathic pain. Pharmacological interventions, such as opioids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antidepressants, and antiepileptics, serve as a first-line treatment option for managing and treating both acute and chronic pain. Opioids are considered one of the most widely used pain medications for managing moderate to severe pain, owing to their rapid onset of medicinal effect and ability to provide immediate pain relief. However, these drugs are associated with significant side effects, such as inducing a euphoric state that may hamper daily activities, lower heart rate, and potentially lead to drug addiction and death. It is important to note that in 2019, approximately 600,000 deaths were attributed to drug overdose worldwide, with nearly 80% of these deaths related to the overuse of opioids.
The opioid crisis has prompted industry stakeholders to develop a vast array of patient-centric pain management devices, including neurostimulation devices, infusion pumps, and radiofrequency ablation devices, to manage pain effectively. These devices serve as a second-line treatment option for decreasing pain. These devices offer various advantages, such as minimal or no drug interaction, targeted therapy, reduced dependency on medications, and minimal adverse effects. Moreover, these devices can be tailored to individual needs, enabling adjustments in intensity and treatment duration, thereby improving patient comfort. Given the ongoing research and development efforts of stakeholders to develop patient-centric devices, the global pain management devices market is expected to grow at a healthy CAGR during the forecast period.
Key Market Segments
Type of Device
Neurostimulation Devices
Infusion Pump
Ablation Devices
Virtual Reality Devices
Other Devices
Type of Neurostimulation Device
Spinal Cord Stimulators
Peripheral Nerve Stimulators
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulators
Deep Brain Stimulators
Other Stimulators
Application Area
Neuropathic Pain
Musculoskeletal Pain
Cancer Pain
Trauma and Surgical Pain
Facial Pain and Migraine
Other Application Areas
Mode of Purchase
Prescription
Over-the-Counter
End User
Hospitals and Clinics
Physiotherapy Centers
Other End Users
Geographical Regions
North America (US, Canada)
Europe (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, UK, Rest of Europe)
Asia-Pacific (Australia, China, India, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Rest of Asia-Pacific)
Middle East and North Africa (Israel, Saudi Arabia, UAE)
Latin America (Brazil, Mexico, Rest of Latin America)
Research Coverage:
A brief introduction to pain and its impact, along with classification of pain and the historical development of the pain management domain over the years. It also provides details on various solutions for pain management, including therapeutics and medical devices. The chapter concludes with discussion on the key future perspectives within the pain management industry.
An overview of the current market landscape of leading pain management device companies, along with information on their year of establishment, company size (in terms of number of employees), location of headquarters, type of device (neurostimulation devices, infusion pump, ablation devices, virtual reality devices and other devices), type of neurostimulation device (spinal cord stimulators, peripheral nerve stimulators, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulators, deep brain stimulators and other stimulators), type of ablation device (radiofrequency ablation devices and cryoablation devices), type of analgesic infusion pump (external infusion pump and intrathecal pumps), type of treatment (invasive / minimally invasive and non-invasive), type of pain managed (acute pain and chronic pain), application area (musculoskeletal pain, post-operative pain, neuropathic pain, cancer pain, facial pain and migraine, trauma pain and other application areas).
An insightful competitiveness analysis of the leading players engaged in the pain management devices market, based on several relevant parameters, such as company strength (in terms of years of experience and company size), portfolio strength (based on number of devices offered, type of pain management devices offered and type of pain managed) and application area. It also includes benchmarking analysis of the leading players based on various parameters, such as company strength, number of devices offered, type of pain management devices offered, type of pain managed and application area.
Elaborate profiles of various prominent players that are currently involved in the pain management devices industry. Each company profile features a brief overview of the company, along with information on the location of headquarters, year of establishment, number of employees, business segments, leadership team, contact details, financial information (if available), product portfolio, recent developments and an informed future outlook.
A detailed analysis of over 330 peer-reviewed, scientific articles related to pain management devices, based on several relevant parameters, such as year of publication, type of publication and popular keywords. The chapter also highlights the top journals, top publishers and top copyright holders.
A qualitative Porter’s five forces analysis, highlighting the five competitive forces prevalent in the pain management devices market, including threats for new entrants, bargaining power of buyers, bargaining power of suppliers, threats of substitute products and rivalry among existing competitors.
An in-depth analysis of the factors that can impact the growth of the pain management devices industry. It also features the identification and analysis of key drivers, potential restraints, emerging opportunities, and existing challenges.
A detailed estimate of the current market size, opportunity and the future growth potential for pain management devices, over the next decade. Based on multiple parameters, likely adoption trends and through secondary research, we have provided an informed estimate on the market evolution during the forecast period, till 2035. The report also features the likely distribution of the current and forecasted opportunity. Further, in order to account for future uncertainties and to add robustness to our model, we have provided three forecast scenarios, namely conservative, base and optimistic scenarios, representing different tracks of the industry’s growth.
A detailed projection of the current size and future opportunity in the pain management devices market across different types of devices, such as neurostimulation devices, infusion pumps, ablation devices, virtual reality devices and other devices.
A detailed projection of the current size and future opportunity in the pain management devices industry across different types of neurostimulation devices, such as spinal cord stimulators, peripheral nerve stimulators, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulators, deep brain stimulators and other stimulators.
A detailed projection of the current size and future opportunity for pain management device companies across different application areas, such as neuropathic pain, musculoskeletal pain, cancer pain, trauma and surgical pain, facial pain and migraine, and other application areas.
A detailed projection of the current size and future opportunity in the pain management devices market across different modes of purchase, such as prescription mode and over-the-counter mode.
A detailed projection of the current size and future opportunity in the pain management devices industry across different end users, such as hospitals and clinics, physiotherapy centers and other end users.
A detailed projection of the current size and future opportunity in the pain management devices market across different geographical regions, such as North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and North Africa, and Latin America.
Key Benefits of Buying this Report
The report provides valuable insights to market leaders and newcomers regarding the revenue estimations of the overall market and its sub-segments.
Stakeholders can utilize the report to enhance their understanding of the competitive landscape, allowing for improved business positioning and more effective go-to-market strategies.
The report provides stakeholders with a pulse on the Pain Management Devices Market, furnishing them with essential information on significant market drivers, barriers, opportunities, and challenges.
Key Companies Profiled
Abbott
AppliedVR
AtriCure
Avanos Medical
Becton, Dickinson and Company
BioElectronics
Hexainnoheal
Litemed
Medtronic
Micrel Medical Devices
Nalu Medical
Nevro
Smileyscope
Stryker
ZetrOZ Systems
Zynex Medical
1. Preface
1.1. Introduction
1.2. Market Share Insights
1.3. Key Market Insights
1.4. Report Coverage
1.5. Key Questions Answered
1.6. Chapter Outlines
2. Research Methodology
2.1. Chapter Overview
2.2. Research Assumptions
2.3. Project Methodology
2.4. Forecast Methodology
2.5. Robust Quality Control
2.6. Key Market Segmentations
2.7. Key Considerations
2.7.1. Demographics
2.7.2. Economic Factors
2.7.3. Government Regulations
2.7.4. Supply Chain
2.7.5. Covid Impact
2.7.6. Market Access
2.7.7. Healthcare Policies
2.7.8. Industry Consolidation
3. Economic And Other Project Specific Considerations
3.1. Chapter Overview
3.2. Market Dynamics
3.2.1. Time Period
3.2.1.1. Historical Trends
3.2.1.2. Current And Future Estimates
3.2.2. Currency Coverage And Foreign Exchange Rate
3.2.2.1. Major Currencies Affecting The Market
3.2.2.2. Factors Affecting Currency Fluctuations And Foreign Exchange Rates
3.2.2.3. Impact Of Foreign Exchange Rate Volatility On The Market
3.2.2.4. Strategies For Mitigating Foreign Exchange Risk
3.2.3. Trade Policies
3.2.3.1. Impact Of Trade Barriers On The Market
3.2.3.2. Strategies For Mitigating The Risks Associated With Trade Barriers
3.2.4. Recession
3.2.4.1. Historical Analysis Of Past Recessions And Lessons Learnt
3.2.4.2. Assessment Of Current Economic Conditions And Potential Impact On The Market
3.2.5. Inflation
3.2.5.1. Measurement And Analysis Of Inflationary Pressures In The Economy
3.2.5.2. Potential Impact Of Inflation On The Market Evolution
4. Executive Summary
5. Introduction
5.1. Chapter Overview
5.2. Pain And Its Impact
5.3. Classification Of Pain
5.3.1. Acute Pain
5.3.2. Chronic Pain
5.4. Historical Evolution Of Pain Management
5.5. Types Of Pain Management Solutions
5.5.1. Pain Management Therapeutics
5.5.2. Pain Management Devices
5.6. Future Perspectives
6. Market Landscape: Leading Pain Management Device Developers
6.1. Chapter Overview
6.2. Leading Pain Management Device Developers: Overall Market Landscape
6.2.1. Analysis By Year Of Establishment
6.2.2. Analysis By Company Size
6.2.3. Analysis By Location Of Headquarters
6.2.4. Analysis By Company Size And Location Of Headquarters
6.2.5. Analysis By Type Of Pain Management Device
6.2.5.1. Analysis By Type Of Neurostimulation Device
6.2.5.2. Analysis By Type Of Ablation Device
6.2.5.3. Analysis By Type Of Analgesic Infusion Pump
6.2.6. Analysis By Type Of Treatment
6.2.7. Analysis By Type Of Pain Managed
6.2.8. Analysis By Application Area
6.2.9. Analysis By Type Of Pain Management Device And Application Area
7. Company Competitiveness Analysis
7.1. Chapter Overview
7.2. Assumptions And Key Parameters
7.3. Methodology
7.4. Leading Pain Management Device Developers: Company Competitiveness Analysis
7.5. Leading Pain Management Device Developers: Benchmarking Analysis
7.5.1. Benchmarking Of Companies
7.5.1.1. Abbott
7.5.1.2. Medtronic
7.5.1.3. Zynex Medical
7.5.1.4. Boston Scientific
7.5.1.5. Omron Healthcare
7.5.2. Benchmarking Of Parameters
7.5.2.1. Leading Pain Management Device Developers: Benchmarking By Competitiveness
7.5.2.2. Leading Pain Management Device Developers: Benchmarking By Portfolio Strength
7.5.2.3. Leading Pain Management Device Developers: Benchmarking By Application Area
8. Company Profiles
8.1. Chapter Overview
8.2. Abbott
8.2.1. Company Overview
8.2.2. Financial Information
8.2.3. Product Portfolio
8.2.4. Recent Developments And Future Outlook
8.3. Avanos Medical
8.3.1. Company Overview
8.3.2. Financial Information
8.3.3. Product Portfolio
8.3.4. Recent Developments And Future Outlook
8.4. Becton, Dickinson And Company (Bd)
8.4.1. Company Overview
8.4.2. Financial Information
8.4.3. Product Portfolio
8.4.4. Recent Developments And Future Outlook
8.5. Medtronic
8.5.1. Company Overview
8.5.2. Financial Information
8.5.3. Product Portfolio
8.5.4. Recent Developments And Future Outlook
8.6. Nalu Medical
8.6.1. Company Overview
8.6.2. Financial Information
8.6.3. Product Portfolio
8.6.4. Recent Developments And Future Outlook
8.7. Nevro
8.7.1. Company Overview
8.7.2. Financial Information
8.7.3. Product Portfolio
8.7.4. Recent Developments And Future Outlook
8.8. Zetroz Systems
8.8.1. Company Overview
8.8.2. Product Portfolio
8.8.3. Recent Developments And Future Outlook
8.9. Zynex Medical
8.9.1. Company Overview
8.9.2. Financial Information
8.9.3. Product Portfolio
8.9.4. Recent Developments And Future Outlook
8.10. Key Winning Strategies Of Leading Players
8.11. Other Leading Players
8.11.1. Appliedvr
8.11.2. Atricure
8.11.3. Bioelectronics
8.11.4.Hexainnoheal
8.11.5. Litemed
8.11.6. Micrel Medical Devices
8.11.7. Smileyscope
8.11.8. Stryker
8.12. Key Winning Strategies Of Other Leading Players