Survey of College & University Faculty Use of AI in Data Management

Survey of College & University Faculty Use of AI in Data Management


The study looks at how many and which faculty are using artificial intelligence in data management, and how they are using it, currently, and planned for the future. The study presents unique data sets for use of AI in many specific facets of data management, including, but not limited to data visualization, data cleaning, finding data, data summary, as a plug in with stat programs, hypotheses generation, data analysis, data upload, data tagging or cataloging, data training and other uses. In addition, survey respondents evaluate their interest in specific generative AI applications, and their level of trust in AI-generated results. Respondents also rate the usefulness of AI in data management, evaluate their impact on the productivity of their data-driven efforts, and comment on their plans.

Just a few of this 129-page report’s many findings are that:

About 11% of respondents reported that their academic libraries offered training in the use of AI applications in data management.

2.36% of respondents felt that their productivity in data management had increased by more than 50% though the use of AI tools.

Non-tenured faculty who were on a tenure track were much likelier than tenured faculty or those not on a tenure track to feel that AI was extraordinarily useful in data management.

Faculty in physics showed the highest use of AI in data visualization.

Data in the report is based on a survey of 339 higher education faculty, predominantly in STEM subjects at research universities. Data in the report is broken out by many institutional and personal variables, enabling the study’s end users to pinpoint use of AI in specific facets of data management by academic field, college type, age, gender and other variables. Data is based on a survey of 339 faculty, drawn predominantly from research universities and medical schools.


Table 1 For which of the following have you used ChatGPT, Gemini or AI enabled Bing?
(Choose all that apply)
Table 1.1.1 For which of the following have you used ChatGPT, Gemini or AI enabled
Bing? As a plug in to stat programs
Table 1.1.2 For which of the following have you used ChatGPT, Gemini or AI enabled
Bing? As a plug in to stat programs Broken out by enrollment
Table 1.1.3 For which of the following have you used ChatGPT, Gemini or AI enabled
Bing? As a plug in to stat programs Broken out by type of college or Carnegie Class
Table 1.1.4 For which of the following have you used ChatGPT, Gemini or AI enabled
Bing? As a plug in to stat programs Broken out by public or private college
Table 1.1.5 For which of the following have you used ChatGPT, Gemini or AI enabled
Bing? As a plug in to stat programs Broken out by age of respondent
Table 1.1.6 For which of the following have you used ChatGPT, Gemini or AI enabled
Bing? As a plug in to stat programs Broken out by political views
Table 1.1.7 For which of the following have you used ChatGPT, Gemini or AI enabled
Bing? As a plug in to stat programs Broken out by tenure status
Table 1.1.8 For which of the following have you used ChatGPT, Gemini or AI enabled
Bing? As a plug in to stat programs Broken out by gender of respondent
Table 1.1.9 For which of the following have you used ChatGPT, Gemini or AI enabled
Bing? As a plug in to stat programs Broken out by race or ethnicity
Table 1.1.10 For which of the following have you used ChatGPT, Gemini or AI
enabled Bing? As a plug in to stat programs Broken out by academic field
Table 1.1.11 For which of the following have you used ChatGPT, Gemini or AI
enabled Bing? As a plug in to stat programs Broken out by years at present
institution

Download our eBook: How to Succeed Using Market Research

Learn how to effectively navigate the market research process to help guide your organization on the journey to success.

Download eBook
Cookie Settings