Unified Endpoint Management Market Size - By Component (Software, Services), By Deployment (Cloud, On-premises), By Operating System (Android, MacOS, Windows, iOS Chrome, Linux), By Application, By End User & Forecast, 2024 - 2032
Unified Endpoint Management Market Size - By Component (Software, Services), By Deployment (Cloud, On-premises), By Operating System (Android, MacOS, Windows, iOS Chrome, Linux), By Application, By End User & Forecast, 2024 - 2032
Unified Endpoint Management Market size will depict over 18.6% CAGR between 2024 and 2032, due to rising integration with AI and machine learning capabilities to automate routine management tasks and improve predictive analytics for endpoint issues.
The influx of regulatory requirements, such as GDPR and HIPAA is driving organizations to implement unified endpoint management (UEM) solutions to ensure compliance across all managed endpoints. The rising focus of UEM vendors on enhancing the user experience by providing intuitive interfaces and self-service capabilities while ensuring minimal disruption to end-users will favor the market growth. For example, in July 2024, NinjaOne launched its new mobile device management (MDM) capabilities to support a broad range of devices, including iOS and Android platforms by offering a UEM system to enhance the overall security and productivity.
The industry is segmented into component, deployment, application, operating system, end-user and region.
In terms of component, the UEM industry size from the services segment will attain immense growth from 2024 to 2032 as they ensure secure access to corporate resources from remote locations for maintaining productivity and security. The increasing frequency and sophistication of cyber-attacks is also necessitating comprehensive security solutions. To that end, UEM services are widely preferred to render advanced threat detection, endpoint protection, and compliance management.
Based on end-user, the UEM market share from the government segment will foresee considerable expansion up to 2032. This can be attributed to the rising vitality of government agencies to manage and secure their diverse endpoints, ensure compliance with regulations as well as support the modern digital transformation initiatives. As governments employ a wide range of devices like desktops, laptops, mobile phones and tablets, UEM allows the centralized management of these diverse devices for offering consistent security and policy enforcement.
Asia Pacific unified endpoint management industry value will register a substantial CAGR between 2024 and 2032, due to the increasing number of cyber threats and data breaches. Governments in the region are launching initiatives to boost digital infrastructure and cybersecurity, further driving the demand for UEM solutions. The proliferation of IoT devices in industries, such as manufacturing, healthcare, and logistics is also creating a need for UEM solutions to manage and secure these devices alongside traditional endpoints, further strengthening the regional market.
Chapter 1 Methodology & Scope
1.1 Market scope & definition
1.2 Research design
1.2.1 Research approach
1.2.2 Data collection methods
1.3 Base estimates & calculations
1.3.1 Base year calculation
1.3.2 Key trends for market estimation
1.4 Forecast model
1.5 Primary research and validation
1.5.1 Primary sources
1.5.2 Data mining sources
Chapter 2 Executive Summary
2.1 Industry 360° synopsis, 2021 - 2032
Chapter 3 Industry Insights
3.1 Industry ecosystem analysis
3.2 Supplier landscape
3.2.1 Software providers
3.2.2 Services provider
3.2.3 Technology providers
3.2.4 End-user
3.3 Profit margin analysis
3.4 Technology & innovation landscape
3.5 Patent analysis
3.6 Key news & initiatives
3.7 Regulatory landscape
3.8 Impact forces
3.8.1 Growth drivers
3.8.1.1 Increasing complexity of endpoint ecosystems
3.8.1.2 Growing demand for cybersecurity and compliance
3.8.1.3 Growing remote work and BYOD policies
3.8.1.4 Proliferation of mobile devices
3.8.2 Industry pitfalls & challenges
3.8.2.1 Complexity in managing diverse devices
3.8.2.2 Integration and interoperability challenges