Denmark Waste Management Market by Waste Type (Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) or Household, Industrial, and Commercial) and by Waste Treatment (Composting, Incineration, Controlled Landfill, Uncontrolled Landfill, Sanitary Landfill, Open Dump, and Recycling)

Best Price Guarantee	Length	Publisher	Published Date	SKU
from $1,575	114 Pages	Next Move Strategy Consulting	October, 2024	NMSC19299789

Best Price Guarantee
Price	from $1,575
Length	114 Pages
Publisher	Next Move Strategy Consulting
Published Date	October, 2024
SKU	NMSC19299789

Denmark Waste Management Market by Waste Type (Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) or Household, Industrial, and Commercial) and by Waste Treatment (Composting, Incineration, Controlled Landfill, Uncontrolled Landfill, Sanitary Landfill, Open Dump, and Recycling)– Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast, 2024 – 2030

Denmark Waste Management Market size was valued at USD 70.04 billion in 2023, and is predicted to reach USD 126.83 billion by 2030, at a CAGR of 7.8% from 2024 to 2030.

The significant rise in recycling and incineration activities is driving the growth of the waste management market in Denmark. This increase in waste processing capabilities improves management efficiency and supports sustainable practices, fueling the demand for advanced waste management solutions. According to the European Environment Agency's 2023 report, Denmark generated over 800 kg of waste per capita, with 53.9% of waste collected for recycling and 45.2% incinerated in 2020. This enhanced processing capability enables more efficient waste disposal, reduces environmental impact, and promotes circular economy principles.

Additionally, recent government initiatives are significantly boosting the market. Policies that promote recycling, waste-to-energy technologies, and circular economy practices are driving market growth. Ambitious recycling targets and infrastructure investments encourage the adoption of advanced waste management solutions. For example, in 2020, the Danish government set a goal to eliminate over 80% of plastic waste from incineration plants by 2030. The government is also mandating the use of ecolabels in state procurement and establishing a clear framework for municipal second-hand shops. These proactive measures foster innovation and attract investment, propelling the market forward.

However, the waste management market in Denmark faces challenges due to regulatory and infrastructure constraints. Stringent environmental regulations and high compliance costs present barriers to market expansion.

On the other hand, he adoption of waste-to-energy technologies such as incineration, anaerobic digestion, and gasification offers substantial growth potential for the waste management market. These technologies convert waste into usable energy, helping reduce reliance on landfills while supporting sustainable energy generation. By turning waste into a valuable resource, waste-to-energy solutions enhance environmental sustainability and fuel market expansion. This forward-thinking approach aligns with global shifts toward circular economy practices and brings economic advantages by generating energy from waste, paving the way for promising growth in the waste recycling sector.

Segment Overview

Denmark waste management industry is segmented based on waste type and waste treatment.
• Based on waste type, the market is segmented into municipal solid waste (MSW) or household, industrial and commercial.
• Based on waste treatment, the market is classified into composting, incineration, controlled landfill, uncontrolled landfill, sanitary landfill, open dump, recycling.

Key Benefits
• Denmark waste management market report provides a quantitative analysis of the current market and estimations through 2024-2030 that assists in identifying the prevailing market opportunities to capitalize on.
• The study comprises a deep dive analysis of the market trend including the current and future trends for depicting the prevalent investment pockets in the market.
• The information related to key drivers, restraints, and opportunities and their impact on the market is provided in the report.
• The competitive analysis of the market players along with their market share in Denmark waste management market.
• The SWOT analysis and Porter’s Five Forces model are elaborated in the study.
• Value chain analysis in the market study provides a clear picture of the stakeholders’ roles.

1 Introduction: 1.1 Report Description; 1.2 Research Methodology; 1.2.1 Secondary Research; 1.2.2 Data Analysis Framework; 1.2.3 Market Size Estimation; 1.2.4 Forecasting; 1.2.5 Primary Research And Data Validation
2 Denmark Waste Management Market By Waste Type: 2.1 Overview; 2.2 Municipal Solid Waste (Msw) Or Household Market; 2.2.1 Food; 2.2.2 Paper And Cardboard; 2.2.3 Plastic; 2.2.4 Glass; 2.2.5 Metal; 2.2.6 Others; 2.3 Industrial Market; 2.3.1 Manufacturing Waste; 2.3.2 Construction And Demolition Waste; 2.3.3 Agriculture Waste; 2.3.4 Other Industrial Waste; 2.4 Commercial Market
3 Denmark Waste Management Market By Waste Treatment: 3.1 Overview; 3.2 Composting Market; 3.3 Incineration Market; 3.4 Controlled Landfill Market; 3.5 Uncontrolled Landfill Market; 3.6 Sanitary Landfill Market; 3.7 Open Dump Market; 3.8 Recycling Market
3 Company Profiles: 3.1 Danish Waste Solutions Aps; 3.1.1 Company Overview; 3.1.2 Company Snapshot; 3.1.3 Operating Business Segments; 3.1.4 Product Portfolio; 3.1.5 Business Performance; 3.1.6 Business Segments; 3.1.7 Geographic Segments; 3.1.8 Key Strategic Moves And Development; 3.1.9 Primary Market Competitors; 3.2 Marius Pedersen A/S Company; 3.2.1 Company Overview; 3.2.2 Company Snapshot; 3.2.3 Operating Business Segments; 3.2.4 Product Portfolio; 3.2.5 Business Performance; 3.2.6 Business Segments; 3.2.7 Geographic Segments; 3.2.8 Key Strategic Moves And Development; 3.2.9 Primary Market Competitors; 3.3 Renosyd; 3.3.1 Company Overview; 3.3.2 Company Snapshot; 3.3.3 Operating Business Segments; 3.3.4 Product Portfolio; 3.3.5 Business Performance; 3.3.6 Business Segments; 3.3.7 Geographic Segments; 3.3.8 Key Strategic Moves And Development; 3.3.9 Primary Market Competitors; 3.4 Vestforbrænding; 3.4.1 Company Overview; 3.4.2 Company Snapshot; 3.4.3 Operating Business Segments; 3.4.4 Product Portfolio; 3.4.5 Business Performance; 3.4.6 Business Segments; 3.4.7 Geographic Segments; 3.4.8 Key Strategic Moves And Development; 3.4.9 Primary Market Competitors; 3.5 Amager Resource Center (Arc); 3.5.1 Company Overview; 3.5.2 Company Snapshot; 3.5.3 Operating Business Segments; 3.5.4 Product Portfolio; 3.5.5 Business Performance; 3.5.6 Business Segments; 3.5.7 Geographic Segments; 3.5.8 Key Strategic Moves And Development; 3.5.9 Primary Market Competitors; 3.6 Avv I/S; 3.6.1 Company Overview; 3.6.2 Company Snapshot; 3.6.3 Operating Business Segments; 3.6.4 Product Portfolio; 3.6.5 Business Performance; 3.6.6 Business Segments; 3.6.7 Geographic Segments; 3.6.8 Key Strategic Moves And Development; 3.6.9 Primary Market Competitors; 3.7 Nordforbrænding; 3.7.1 Company Overview; 3.7.2 Company Snapshot; 3.7.3 Operating Business Segments; 3.7.4 Product Portfolio; 3.7.5 Business Performance; 3.7.6 Business Segments; 3.7.7 Geographic Segments; 3.7.8 Key Strategic Moves And Development; 3.7.9 Primary Market Competitors; 3.8 Affaldvarme Aarhus; 3.8.1 Company Overview; 3.8.2 Company Snapshot; 3.8.3 Operating Business Segments; 3.8.4 Product Portfolio; 3.8.5 Business Performance; 3.8.6 Business Segments; 3.8.7 Geographic Segments; 3.8.8 Key Strategic Moves And Development; 3.8.9 Primary Market Competitors; 3.9 Refa; 3.9.1 Company Overview; 3.9.2 Company Snapshot; 3.9.3 Operating Business Segments; 3.9.4 Product Portfolio; 3.9.5 Business Performance; 3.9.6 Business Segments; 3.9.7 Geographic Segments; 3.9.8 Key Strategic Moves And Development; 3.9.9 Primary Market Competitors; 3.10 Rgs Nordic; 3.10.1 Company Overview; 3.10.2 Company Snapshot; 3.10.3 Operating Business Segments; 3.10.4 Product Portfolio; 3.10.5 Business Performance; 3.10.6 Business Segments; 3.10.7 Geographic Segments; 3.10.8 Key Strategic Moves And Development; 3.10.9 Primary Market Competitors