Ongoing sustainability efforts continue to significantly impact the US packaging industry. Driven – at least in part – by public pressure, packaging producers and end users are increasingly concerned about the environmental effects of their products. This has sparked a variety of key trends and targets in the packaging industry, such as source reduction, improved recycling rates (especially for plastics) and the increased use of biodegradable and/or compostable materials.
Over the past decade, several major companies in the packaging industry have set sustainability-oriented goals; some of their deadlines come as early as 2025. Reducing the amount of virgin plastics and improving overall packaging efficiency are among the most prominent objectives. However, concerns regarding the feasibility of those timetables have grown. For example, despite significant progress in recent years, the Ellen MacArthur Foundation recently cast doubt on its major plastic reduction goals by indicating that most participating companies will not meet them. To achieve these sustainability targets, many packaging producers will have to accelerate their efforts or face potential consumer and regulatory backlash.
Paper & Plastic Continue to Dominate Packaging but See Growing Competition Paper and conventional plastics have long been the preferred materials for the vast majority of packaging products due to their versatility, performance, and low cost. These materials have proven their efficacy across wide ranges of packaging markets and formats. They will continue to see high usage, but also face increasing competition from alternative materials – such as bioplastics and molded fiber – that are viewed as having stronger environmental profiles. Conventional plastic will be hampered by its contribution to problems with pollution and its reliance on unsustainable fossil fuels. Furthermore, wider implementation of reusable packaging will pose a threat to traditional single-use paper and plastic packaging.
Recent increases in the price of raw materials have coupled with lingering supply chain and labor availability issues to push the price of many packaging products to record highs. As a result, some end users have switched back to less expensive conventional materials with better availability. However, high material costs have also accelerated efforts like thin walling and the reduction of unnecessary secondary packaging, which reduce the overall volume of packaging material used.
Thus price inflation has, from a sustainability perspective, had both positive and negative effects on the packaging market. While many eco-friendly packaging materials – such as bioplastics – are even more expensive than traditional ones (and therefore pose additional challenges to end users who wish to incorporate them into packaging lines), efforts to reduce the amount of unnecessary packaging have helped companies both save money and reduce waste. While prices are expected to moderate going forward, they are expected to remain above historical norms for many materials.
Study Description
This study is focused on identifying key trends in sustainability in the packaging industry. Sustainability trends are analyzed by leading packaging material (plastic, paper, metal, glass, molded fiber) and in terms of packaging producer and end user sustainability goals. Historical data and forecasts for overall packaging demand and key market segments (food, beverage, pharmaceuticals, foodservice disposables, and other markets including e-commerce) are also provided. Additionally, profiles of select packaging products, markets, and materials are highlighted. Consumer survey data related to packaging sustainability collected by The Freedonia Group are also presented.
Executive Summary
Table Figure 1-1. Sustainable Packaging Market
COVID-19 Pandemic
Overview
Impact on the Economy
Table Macroeconomic Indicators, 2020 – 2024
Table Figure 2-1. Real GDP by Economic Sector, 2020 – 2023
Impact on the Packaging Industry
Impact on Sustainability Efforts
Packaging Introduction
Study Scope & Packaging Definition
Packaging Markets
Sales Outlook
Table Figure 3-1. Packaging Demand, 2012 – 2024
Markets Overview
Table Figure 3-2. Packaging Demand by Market, 2023
Food Packaging
Table Figure 3-3. Food Packaging Demand by Material, 2023
Beverage Packaging
Table Figure 3-4. Beverage Packaging Demand by Material, 2023
Pharmaceutical Packaging
Table Figure 3-5. Pharmaceutical Packaging Demand by Material, 2023
Foodservice
Table Figure 3-6. Foodservice Packaging Demand by Material, 2023
Table Key Advantages & Disadvantages by Packaging Material Type
Demand by Material
Table Figure 3-8. Packaging Demand by Material, 2023
Paper Packaging
Plastic Packaging
Metal Packaging
Molded Fiber Packaging
Glass Packaging
Other Packaging
What Drives Packaging Choice?
The Challenge in Finding the Best Packaging Solution
Pricing Trends & Packaging Cost
Table Figure 4-1. Comparison of Prices for Competitive Packaging Products
Performance
Table Key Performance Characteristics by Packaging Material Type
Changing Package Size Preferences
Shelf Appeal
Regulations
Plastic Bag & Container Bans
PFAS (Perfluoroalkyl & Polyfluoroalkyl Substances) in Food Packaging
Container Deposit Laws
Recycled Plastic Content Regulations
Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)
Consumer Attitudes & Packaging Preferences
Recycling Participation Rated by Material
Table Consumer Recycling Frequency by Type of Packaging, 2023
Packaging Materials Ranked by Perceived Eco-Friendliness
Table Consumer Perception of the Eco-Friendliness of Packaging Materials, 2023
Sustainable Packaging Features Particularly Sought by Consumers
Table Features Consumers Especially Look for When Considering "Sustainable" or "Eco-Friendly" Packaging by Gender, Age Group, Urban vs. Rural Setting, &Annual Household Income Bracket, 2023
Attitudes About Recycling & Biodegradability
Table Consumer Attitudes About Recycled Plastics & Biodegradability by Gender, Age Group, Urban vs. Rural Setting, &Annual Household Income Bracket, 2023
Attitudes About Recycling
Table Consumer Attitudes About Recycling by Gender, Age Group, Urban vs. Rural Setting, &Annual Household Income Bracket, 2023
Attitudes About Recyclable or Compostable Packaging
Table Consumer Attitudes About Recyclable & Recycled Content in Packaging by Gender, Age Group, Urban vs. Rural Setting, &Annual Household Income Bracket, 2023
Curbside Recycling Services: Consumer Access
Table Access To Curbside Recycling at Home by Product to Recycle, Gender, Age Group, Urban vs. Rural Setting, &Annual Household Income Bracket, 2023
Drop-Off Recycling Services: Consumer Usage
Table Usage of Drop-Off Recycling Services (at a Store, Community Bin, Waste Management Facility, etc.) in the Last 12 Months by Product, Gender, Age Group, Urban vs. Rural Setting, &Annual Household Income Bracket, 2023
What Is Sustainability?
Introduction
Total Environmental Footprint
Key Goals
Resource/Waste Reduction
Energy Efficiency
Pollution & Waste Prevention
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Food Waste Reduction
Areas of Focus
Recycling
Recycled Content Usage
Biodegradability
Compostability
Renewable Resources
Reusability
Packaging Material Sustainability Comparison
Competitive Factors
Table Rating Packaging Materials by Sustainability Metric
Table Figure 8-2. Bioplastic Packaging Demand by Material, 2023
PLA (Polylactic Acid) Polymers
PHA (Polyhydroxyalkanoate) Polymers
Suppliers
Consumer Insights: Conventional Plastics v. Bioplastics
Table Consumer Perspectives on the Eco-Friendliness of Packaging Using Conventional Petroleum-Based Plastics by Gender, Age Group, Urban vs. Rural Setting, &Annual Household Income Bracket 2023
Table Consumer Perspectives on the Eco-Friendliness of Packaging Using Plant-Based Bioplastics by Gender, Age Group, Urban vs. Rural Setting, &Annual Household Income Bracket, 2023
Table Plastic Packaging Waste Collected for Recycling by Product & Resin, 2018 – 2021
Labeling & Bale Standards
Captive Recycling Operations
Source Reduction Efforts
Biodegradable Plastics
Compostable Plastics
Bioplastics
Packaging Producer Strategies & Goals
Leading Plastic Packaging Producers
Amcor
Berry Global
Sealed Air
Consumer Trends in Plastic Packaging Recycling
Plastic Container Recycling
Table Consumer Frequency of Plastic Container Curb-Side Recycling by Gender, Age Group, Urban vs. Rural Setting, &Annual Household Income Bracket, 2023
Table Consumer Frequency of Plastic Container Drop-Off Recycling by Gender, Age Group, Urban vs. Rural Setting, &Annual Household Income Bracket, 2023
Plastic Film & Bag Recycling
Table Consumer Frequency of Plastic Film & Bag Curb-Side Recycling by Gender, Age Group, Urban vs. Rural Setting, &Annual Household Income Bracket, 2022
New Product Development Efforts
Paper & Paperboard Packaging
Leading Packaging Products
Table Figure 12-1. Paper & Paperboard Packaging: Product Examples
Key Sustainability Metrics
Paper Recycling Rate
Table Figure 12-2. Paper & Paperboard Packaging Recycling Rate by Product, 2010, 2015, 2017, &2018
Recycled Content Usage
Source Reduction Efforts
Biodegradable & Compostable Products
Packaging Producer Strategies & Goals
Consumer Trends in Paper Packaging Recycling
Paper Recycling
Table Consumer Frequency of Paper Curb-Side Recycling by Gender, Age Group, Urban vs. Rural Setting, &Annual Household Income Bracket, 2023
Table Consumer Frequency of Paper Drop-Off Recycling by Gender, Age Group, Urban vs. Rural Setting, &Annual Household Income Bracket, 2023
Paperboard & Corrugated Recycling
Table Consumer Frequency of Paperboard & Corrugated Curb-Side Recycling by Gender, Age Group, Urban vs. Rural Setting, &Annual Household Income Bracket, 2023
Table Consumer Frequency of Paperboard & Corrugated Drop-Off Recycling by Gender, Age Group, Urban vs. Rural Setting, &Annual Household Income Bracket, 2023
New Product Development Efforts
Metal Packaging
Leading Packaging Products
Table Figure 13-1. Metal Packaging: Product Examples
Key Sustainability Metrics
Metal Recycling Rate
Table Figure 13-2. Metal Packaging Recycling Rate by Type, 2010, 2015, 2017, &2018