mHealth Apps Patent Landscape Report and Forecast 2024-2032

mHealth Apps Patent Landscape Report and Forecast 2024-2032


Bladder Cancer Drug Pipeline Analysis 2024

The drug pipeline is significantly driven by the increasing prevalence of bladder cancer, with an estimated 83,190 new cases expected in the United States in 2024, making it the sixth most common cancer in the country. This includes 63,070 cases in men and 20,120 in women, highlighting the significant health burden of this disease.

Key Takeaways
  • Major companies involved in the bladder cancer drug pipeline market include Endo Pharmaceuticals, Fidia Farmaceutici S.p.A., TScan Therapeutics, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, BioNTech US Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Pfizer, Inc.
  • The current drug pipeline for bladder cancer includes promising candidates such as enfortumab vedotin, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and sacituzumab govitecan, among others.
  • Regulatory agencies are providing support through expedited pathways for drug approvals and designations, encouraging rapid development and market availability of new therapies.
Report Coverage

The bladder cancer drug pipeline analysis provides an overview of recent advancements and ongoing clinical trials. The report highlights progress in targeted therapies and immunotherapies, aiming for improved survival rates and quality of life. It covers innovative approaches such as checkpoint inhibitors that enhance immune response and antibody-drug conjugates that deliver cytotoxic agents directly to cancer cells. The competitive landscape examines collaborations and strategic partnerships that accelerate R&D. It also discusses regulatory milestones achieved by investigational drugs, highlighting their impact on future treatment paradigms, and promising more effective and personalized treatment options for bladder cancer patients.

Bladder Cancer Drug Pipeline Outlook

Bladder cancer is a significant health concern globally, characterized by the abnormal growth of cells within the bladder. The disease is often categorized into non-muscle-invasive, muscle-invasive, and metastatic stages, each requiring different treatment strategies. Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) accounts for most cases and is typically treated with intravesical therapies, while muscle-invasive and metastatic cases often require systemic chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or surgery.

In 2024, significant advancements in bladder cancer treatment have been made. The FDA approved Padcev (enfortumab vedotin) for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer who have previously received a PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor, demonstrating improved overall survival in clinical trials.

Significant advancements in treatment have been made in recent years, particularly with the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors like atezolizumab and pembrolizumab, which offer new options for patients with advanced bladder cancer. The market is witnessing increased investment in research and development and regulatory approvals for innovative drugs such as enfortumab vedotin, underscoring a dynamic landscape focused on enhancing patient outcomes.

Bladder Cancer- Pipeline Drug Profiles

Recent developments in bladder cancer treatment have introduced several promising drugs currently in clinical trials:
  • AU-011: This light-activated drug targets malignant cells in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. The therapy involves using a laser to activate the drug within cancer cells, minimizing damage to surrounding tissues and providing a localized treatment with fewer side effects.
  • BI 6727 (Volasertib): An investigational drug that inhibits polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1), which is crucial for cell division. By disrupting this process, BI 6727 aims to halt the proliferation of cancer cells in advanced bladder cancer, offering a potential treatment for aggressive forms of the disease.
  • LOXO-435: A selective RET inhibitor being evaluated for its ability to target specific genetic mutations associated with aggressive bladder cancer forms. This drug is designed to inhibit pathways critical for tumor growth and survival, particularly in genetically defined patient subgroups.
  • Atezolizumab: Atezolizumab is a PD-L1 inhibitor used either as a monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy. It works by boosting the immune response against bladder cancer cells, showing effectiveness in high-risk muscle-invasive cases.
Drug Pipeline Therapeutic Assessment

This section of the report covers the analysis of Bladder Cancer drugs based on various segmentations such as:

Analysis by Route of Administration
  • Oral
Oral drugs like erdafitinib are designed to target specific genetic mutations in bladder cancer, providing a convenient treatment option that enhances patient compliance. These therapies are particularly effective in patients with FGFR genetic alterations.
  • Parenteral
Intravenous therapies, such as pembrolizumab, are common for treating advanced bladder cancer. These immune checkpoint inhibitors are administered intravenously to provide rapid and effective delivery, enhancing patient outcomes through the modulation of immune responses.
  • Others
Intravesical therapy remains a cornerstone for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer, where drugs are directly delivered into the bladder. Examples include BCG and mitomycin C, which are used to prevent recurrence by stimulating the local immune response within the bladder.

Analysis by Phase

According to EMR analysis, Phase II clinical trials dominate the bladder cancer drug pipeline. The number of bladder cancer drugs currently in Phase 2 clinical trials varies as new trials are continually initiated and completed. However, as of the latest data, there are over 50 ongoing Phase 2 trials for bladder cancer drugs worldwide. These trials involve a wide range of therapeutic approaches, including targeted therapies, immunotherapies, and combination treatments.
  • Preclinical Phase: Laboratory and animal studies to assess safety and efficacy.
  • Phase I: Small-scale human trials focusing on safety and dosage.
  • Phase II: Larger trials to evaluate efficacy and side effects.
  • Phase III: Large-scale trials to confirm effectiveness, monitor side effects, and compare with standard treatments.
  • Phase IV: Post-marketing studies to gather more information on risks, benefits, and optimal use.
Analysis by Drug Class
  • Small Molecule
Small molecule drugs, such as erdafitinib, target specific genetic alterations like FGFR mutations found in some bladder cancers. These therapies offer personalized treatment options by directly interacting with cellular processes critical for tumor growth and survival, providing a targeted approach that can be more effective for patients with specific genetic profiles.
  • Polymer
Polymeric drug delivery systems, like liposomal formulations of doxorubicin, encapsulate the active drug in liposomes to improve its delivery and reduce systemic toxicity. This approach enhances the drug's efficacy by allowing higher concentrations to reach the tumor site while minimizing adverse effects, thus improving the overall safety profile of the treatment.
  • Monoclonal Antibody
Monoclonal antibodies, such as nivolumab, are designed to target and inhibit specific proteins like PD-1/PD-L1 pathways that help cancer cells evade the immune system. By blocking these pathways, monoclonal antibodies enhance the immune system's ability to recognize and destroy cancer cells, offering a potent therapeutic strategy for bladder cancer.
  • Peptides
Peptide-based therapies, like cetrorelix, are explored for their ability to modulate biological pathways, including hormonal influences on tumor growth. Cetrorelix, a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, is being investigated for its potential to indirectly influence cancer progression by altering the hormonal environment within the body.
  • Gene Therapy
Gene therapy involves altering genetic material within cells to correct mutations or enhance immune responses against cancer. This approach is still largely experimental in bladder cancer but holds promise for personalized treatments that address the underlying genetic drivers of the disease, potentially leading to more effective and long-lasting outcomes.

Bladder Cancer Drug Clinical Trials Assessment- Competitive Dynamics

Here are a few notable participants involved in Bladder Cancer research and development:

These advancements represent significant steps forward in Bladder Cancer treatment, potentially offering patients more effective and less burdensome options.

Endo Pharmaceuticals: Headquartered in Malvern, Pennsylvania, Endo Pharmaceuticals focuses on developing intravesical treatments specifically designed for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Their research targets the unique biology of bladder cancer to prevent recurrence by delivering therapeutic agents directly into the bladder. This approach aims to maintain high local drug concentrations while minimizing systemic exposure, thus reducing the risk of recurrence and side effects.

Fidia Farmaceutici S.p.A.: Based in Italy, Fidia Farmaceutici S.p.A. is advancing the treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer with innovative drug formulations. These formulations are designed to improve retention and efficacy within the bladder, enhancing therapeutic outcomes. Fidia's research focuses on developing novel delivery systems that optimize drug exposure to the bladder wall, aiming to prevent disease progression and recurrence.

TScan Therapeutics, Inc.: Headquartered in Waltham, Massachusetts, TScan Therapeutics is exploring T-cell receptor-engineered therapies to improve the targeting and elimination of cancer cells. This cutting-edge approach involves engineering T-cells to recognize specific antigens on bladder cancer cells, offering a potential application for both non-muscle invasive and advanced bladder cancer treatment. TScan's technology aims to provide highly specific and effective cancer cell targeting, potentially improving patient outcomes.

Bristol-Myers Squibb : Based in New York City, Bristol-Myers Squibb is a leader in the development of immunotherapies, including drugs like nivolumab. These therapies enhance the immune system's response against bladder cancer by inhibiting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway, which cancer cells often exploit to evade immune detection. Nivolumab has shown promise in improving outcomes for patients with advanced bladder cancer by restoring the body's natural ability to fight tumors.

Other key players in the market include AstraZeneca, BioNTech US Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Inc.

Reasons To Purchase This Report

The Bladder Cancer drug pipeline analysis report offers invaluable insights into the latest advancements and future trends in Bladder Cancer treatment. It provides detailed evaluations of emerging therapies, pipeline assessment, and competitive landscape analysis, enabling informed investment decisions and strategic planning.

Key Questions Answered in the Bladder Cancer Drug Pipeline Analysis Report
  • What is the current state of the bladder cancer drug pipeline?
  • How many companies are currently involved in bladder cancer drug development?
  • What is the number of drugs in Phase III and Phase IV trials for bladder cancer?
  • Which organisations are at the forefront of bladder cancer drug research?
  • What are the effectiveness and safety profiles of the drugs in the bladder cancer pipeline?
  • What opportunities and challenges exist in the bladder cancer clinical trial landscape?
  • Which companies are leading the major clinical trials for bladder cancer drugs?
  • Which regions are involved in clinical trials for bladder cancer?
  • What are the recent clinical trial results for bladder cancer drugs?
  • What are the emerging trends in bladder cancer clinical trials?


1 Introduction
2 Executive Summary
3 Global MHealth Apps Market Overview
3.1 Global MHealth Apps Market Historical Value (2017-2023)
3.2 Global MHealth Apps Market Forecast Value (2024-2032)
4 Global MHealth Apps Market Segmentation
4.1 Global MHealth Apps Market (2017-2032) By Type
4.1.1 Market Overview
4.1.2 Medical Apps
4.1.2.1 Women’s Health Apps
4.1.2.2 Personal Health Record Apps
4.1.2.3 Medication Management Apps
4.1.2.4 Diagnostic Apps
4.1.2.5 Remote Monitoring Apps
4.1.2.6 Disease Management Apps
4.1.2.7 Others
4.1.3 Fitness Apps
4.1.3.1 Diet & Nutrition
4.1.3.2 Exercise & Fitness
4.1.3.3 Lifestyle & Stress
4.2 Global MHealth Apps Market (2017-2032) by Platform
4.2.1 Market Overview
4.2.2 Android
4.2.3 iOS
4.3 Global MHealth Apps Market (2017-2032) by Applications
4.3.1 Market Overview
4.3.2 Monitoring
4.3.3 Fitness
4.3.4 Diagnostic
4.3.5 Treatment
4.3.6 Others
5 Global Market Dynamics
5.1 Market Drivers and Constraints
5.2 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
5.3 PESTEL Analysis
5.4 Industry Events, Initiatives, and Trends
5.5 Value Chain Analysis
6 Global MHealth Apps Patent Landscape Analysis
6.1 Patent Distribution by Publication Year
6.2 Patent Distribution by Application Year
6.3 Patent Distribution by Priority Year
6.4 Analysis by Type of Patent
6.4.1 Granted Patents
6.4.2 Patent Application
6.4.3 Amended Application
6.4.4 Search Report
6.5 Analysis by Legal Status
6.5.1 Active
6.5.2 Pending
6.5.3 Expired/Discontinued
6.6 Analysis by Patent Jurisdiction
6.7 Analysis by Patent Age
6.8 Analysis by Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) Codes
6.9 Average Time to Publish a Patent
6.9.1 By Entities
6.9.2 By Jurisdiction
6.9.3 By Technology
6.10 Analysis by Type of Entity (Academic and Non-Academic)
6.11 Analysis by Top Applicants
6.12 Analysis by Top Inventors
7 Global MHealth Apps Patent Analysis by Technology
7.1 Total Patents by Top Technologies
7.2 Time Evolution of Patents by Technology
7.3 Emerging Technologies
7.4 Patent Segmentation, By Product Type
7.4.1 Time Evolution by Number of Patents
7.4.2 Time Evolution by Number of Patent Families
7.4.3 Analysis by Type of Entity (Academic vs Non-Academic)
7.4.4 Analysis by Top Applicants
7.4.5 Analysis by Top Inventors
7.5 Patent Segmentation, By Material Type
*Complete technology list will be provided in the report.
8 EMR Patent Valuation Analysis
8.1 Assessment Methodology
8.2 High Value Patents
8.3 Medium Value Patents
8.4 Low Value Patents
9 Global MHealth Apps – Top 10 Players Patent Analysis
9.1 Top 10 Entities by Number of Patents
9.2 Analysis by Publication Year
9.3 Analysis by Application Year
9.4 Analysis by Priority Year
9.5 Analysis by Type of Patent
9.6 Analysis by Jurisdiction
9.7 Analysis by Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) Codes
9.8 Analysis by Source of Innovation
9.9 Analysis by Forward and Backward Citations
9.10 Analysis by Legal Status
9.11 Analysis by Patent Age
9.12 Analysis by Key Inventors
9.13 Entity Dynamics
9.13.1 Analysis by Type of Player (Academic vs Non-Academic)
9.13.2 Analysis by Collaboration
9.13.3 Analysis by Technology
9.13.4 Newcomers
9.13.4.1 Start-up Companies
9.13.4.2 Established Companies
10 Patent Profile of Key Players
10.1 Apple Inc .
10.1.1 Product Portfolio
10.1.2 Patent Portfolio by Patent Families
10.1.3 Time Evolution of Patents
10.1.4 Geographical Patent Coverage
10.1.5 Patent Analysis by Technology
10.1.6 Patent News and Developments
10.1.7 Financial Analysis
10.1.8 SWOT Analysis
10.2 Fitbit Inc.
10.3 Alivecor Inc.
10.4 Ims Health Inc.
11 Future Trends
12 Global MHealth Apps Landscape (Additional Insight)*
12.1 Global MHealth Apps: Developers Landscape
12.1.1 Analysis by Year of Establishment
12.1.2 Analysis by Company Size
12.1.3 Analysis by Region
12.2 Global MHealth Apps: Product Landscape
12.2.1 Analysis by Type
12.2.2 Analysis by Platform
*Additional insights are not provided in the standard report.

Download our eBook: How to Succeed Using Market Research

Learn how to effectively navigate the market research process to help guide your organization on the journey to success.

Download eBook
Cookie Settings