Therapeutic mRNA Patent Landscape Report and Forecast 2024-2032

Therapeutic mRNA Patent Landscape Report and Forecast 2024-2032


e.

Analysis by Wound Type
  • Acute Wound
  • Chronic Wound
The patent segmentation by wound type includes acute wounds and chronic wounds. Among these, chronic wound treatment devices dominate the patent landscape, with over 1,800 patents granted historically and more than 300 new filings recently. Their dominance is due to innovations aimed at improving long-term healing and patient care. Future patent growth is anticipated with advancements in AI-driven systems and personalised treatment approaches, enhancing chronic wound management.

Analysis by End User
  • Hospitals
  • Specialty Clinics
  • Ambulatory Surgical Centres
  • Others
The patent segmentation by end user includes hospitals, specialty clinics, ambulatory surgical centres, and others. Hospitals lead the patent landscape with over 2,000 patents historically and more than 250 new filings in the last year. This dominance is due to innovations in system integration and treatment efficiency. Future growth is expected as advancements target workflow optimisation and telemedicine capabilities, reinforcing hospitals' leadership in the patent landscape.

Wound Therapy Devices Patent Jurisdiction Analysis

The global patent landscape for wound therapy devices is characterised by significant activity across key regions, including the United States, Europe, and Asia Pacific. In the United States, over 2,000 patents have been filed, driven by major companies' focus on advanced wound care technologies and regulatory support. In Europe, particularly in Germany and the UK, over 1,500 patents emphasize innovations in device safety and efficiency, influenced by stringent regulatory standards and collaborative research efforts. The Asia Pacific region, notably China and Japan, has filed over 1,200 patents, reflecting a dynamic and expanding healthcare technology landscape, with an emphasis on cost-effective and scalable solutions.

Patent Profile of Key Companies

The patent landscape for wound therapy devices is shaped by several key companies driving innovation and securing intellectual property. Here is an overview of their patent activities.

Smith & Nephew Plc

Smith & Nephew, headquartered in London, UK, holds over 1,300 patents related to wound therapy devices, with around 150 patents in progress. The company focuses on innovations in NPWT systems and advanced wound dressings, emphasizing patient comfort and treatment efficacy. Smith & Nephew's strategic patent filings aim to maintain its leadership in wound care technology.

Mölnlycke Health Care AB

Mölnlycke Health Care, based in Gothenburg, Sweden, has filed over 1,000 patents in the wound therapy devices sector, with approximately 100 patents currently in progress. The company focuses on advanced dressing technologies and integrating smart systems into wound care devices. Mölnlycke's innovations are directed at improving patient outcomes and enhancing device functionality.

Other key players in the industry include Medical LLc., Kci Licensing Inc, and Hartmann Paul Ag.
  • Key Questions Answered in the Global Wound Therapy Devices Patent Landscape ReportWhat is the current state of the global patent landscape for wound therapy devices?
  • Which companies are leading patent filings in the wound therapy devices industry?
  • What are the key drivers of patent activity in the wound therapy devices industry?
  • How do NPWT and HBOT devices contribute to advancements in wound care driving patent landscape?
  • How does smart technology integration impactthe patent activities in wound therapy devices industry?
  • Which regions are most active in patent filings for wound therapy devices, and why?
  • How do patents for chronic wound treatment devices differ from those for acute wound management?
  • What future trends are anticipated in the wound therapy devices patent landscape?
  • How does the jurisdictional focus vary across different regions in wound therapy device patents?
  • What are the challenges faced by companies in securing patents for wound therapy devices?
  • How do patents for hospital-focused devices differ from those for specialty clinics and ambulatory centres?
  • What impact does regulatory compliance have on patent filings in the wound therapy devices industry?
  • How is the competitive landscape in the wound therapy devices industry shaped by patent activities?
Reasons to Purchase this Report

This report offers an in-depth analysis of the patent landscape, covering key trends, technological advancements, and regional insights. It provides detailed segmentation and highlights areas of significant innovation and activity. By examining leading companies' strategies and patent portfolios, the report elucidates competitive dynamics and emerging opportunities. Stakeholders will gain valuable information for strategic decision-making, ensuring they stay ahead in the evolving market. This comprehensive coverage makes it an essential resource for understanding the industry's future direction."
"Global Spinal Implants and Surgery Devices Patent Landscape Report 2024

Global Spinal Implants and Surgery Devices Industry Size

The global spinal implants and surgery devices market was valued at USD 11.7 billion in 2023. The market is expected to grow at a CAGR of 4% during the forecast period of 2024-2032, with the values likely to reach USD 16.6 billion by 2032. The United States is leading in patent filings for spinal implants and surgery devices holding over 4,000 patents focused on minimally invasive techniques, advanced biologics, and smart implant technologies. Approximately 500 new patents were filed in the past year, indicating ongoing innovation.

Patent Landscape Report Coverage

This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the global spinal implants and surgery devices patent landscape. It examines patent trends, key innovations, and emerging technologies in spinal implant and surgery devices. The report covers patent filings, patent grants, and leading companies, highlighting strategic advancements and innovations shaping the future of spinal surgery technology. It serves as an essential resource for stakeholders seeking insights into the intellectual property dynamics and competitive landscape of the spinal implants and surgery devices industry.

Global Spinal Implants and Surgery Devices Patent Outlook
  • The spinal implants and surgery devices industry is driven by innovations in minimally invasive techniques, advanced biologics, and smart implant technologies. Devices like spinal fusion systems and biologic solutions have over 6,500 patents filed, enhancing surgical precision, patient recovery, and procedural safety, propelling industry growth.
  • Leading companies such as Warsaw Orthopedic Inc and Globus Medical Inc have collectively filed over 3,300 patents. Their focus on smart implant systems, minimally invasive technologies, and biologics drives innovation and strengthens their industry position in the spinal surgery sector.
  • The United States leads with over 4,000 patents, driven by advancements in technology and minimally invasive procedures. Europe, with 2,800 patents, emphasizes procedural efficiency and patient safety, guided by stringent regulations. Asia Pacific, led by China and Japan, filed over 2,300 patents, focusing on cost-effective, scalable healthcare solutions.
Spinal Implants and Surgery Devices Introduction

Spinal implants and surgery devices play a crucial role in treating spinal disorders and improving patient mobility. These devices include spinal fusion devices, biologics, and non-fusion technologies, which are designed to restore spinal stability and alleviate pain. The patent landscape for spinal implants reflects significant innovation driven by the demand for minimally invasive procedures, enhanced patient outcomes, and integration of advanced materials and technologies.
  • Devices such as minimally invasive spinal fusion systems are gaining popularity for their ability to reduce recovery time and surgical trauma. Over 3,000 patents have been filed, with recent innovations focusing on endoscopic techniques and navigation systems that improve procedural precision and patient recovery.
  • Spinal biologics, including demineralised bone matrix (DBM) and bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP), are central to enhancing fusion rates and healing. Approximately 2,000 patents have been filed, with new developments emphasizing bioactive materials and stem cell integration to improve efficacy and safety.
  • The development of smart implants that monitor healing and adjust to patient-specific anatomical structures is a key driver, with around 1,500 patents filed. These innovations focus on integrating sensors and data analytics to personalise treatment and improve surgical outcomes.
These drivers foster a dynamic patent landscape, promoting cutting-edge innovations that improve spinal surgery outcomes and patient care.

Global Spinal Implants and Surgery Devices Patent Segmentation Analysis

The report provides an in-depth analysis of the patents in this field by the following segmentation:

Analysis by Product
  • Spinal Fusion Devices
  • Thoracic and Lumbar Fusion Devices
  • Cervical Fusion Devices
  • Spinal Biologics
  • Allografts
  • Xenografts
  • DBM
  • BMP
  • Synthetic Bone Grafts
  • Non-fusion Devices
  • Spinal Bone Growth Stimulators
  • Others
The patent segmentation in the spinal implants and surgery devices industry includes spinal fusion devices, spinal biologics, synthetic bone grafts, non-fusion devices, spinal bone growth stimulators, and others. Among these, spinal fusion devices lead the patent landscape with over 2,500 patents granted historically and more than 400 new filings in the last year. This dominance is driven by innovations in minimally invasive techniques and enhanced fusion materials. Future growth is expected as advancements focus on integrating smart technologies and personalised treatment approaches.

Analysis by Surgery Type
  • Open Spine Surgery
  • Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery
The patent segmentation by surgery type includes open spine surgery and minimally invasive spine surgery. Minimally invasive spine surgery dominates the patent landscape with over 1,800 patents historically and more than 300 new filings recently. This leadership is due to innovations aimed at reducing patient trauma and recovery time. Future growth is anticipated as advancements target enhanced imaging and navigation systems.

Analysis by Procedure Type
  • Discectomy
  • Laminotomy
  • Foraminotomy
  • Corpectomy
  • Facetectomy
  • Others
The patent segmentation by procedure type includes discectomy, laminotomy, foraminotomy, corpectomy, facetectomy, and others. Discectomy procedures lead the patent landscape, with over 1,200 patents historically and more than 150 new filings in the last year. Innovations focus on improving surgical precision and patient outcomes, enhancing procedural success rates. Future growth is expected as advancements target minimally invasive techniques and automation.

Analysis by End User
  • Hospitals
  • Orthopedic Centers
  • Others
The patent segmentation by end user includes hospitals, orthopedic centres, and others. Hospitals lead the patent landscape with over 2,200 patents historically and more than 400 new filings in the last year. This dominance is due to innovations in integrated surgical systems and enhanced patient care protocols. Future growth is expected as advancements focus on telemedicine integration and workflow optimisation.

Spinal Implants and Surgery Devices Patent Jurisdiction Analysis

The global patent landscape for spinal implants and surgery devices is characterised by significant activity across key regions, including the United States, Europe, and Asia Pacific. In the United States, over 4,000 patents have been filed, driven by major companies' focus on integrating advanced technologies and minimally invasive techniques. In Europe, particularly in Germany and the UK, over 2,800 patents emphasize innovations in procedural efficiency and patient safety, influenced by stringent regulatory standards. The Asia Pacific region, notably China and Japan, has filed over 2,300 patents, reflecting a dynamic and expanding healthcare technology landscape, with an emphasis on cost-effective and scalable solutions.

Patent Profile of Key Companies

The patent landscape for spinal implants and surgery devices is shaped by several key companies driving innovation and securing intellectual property. Here is an overview of their patent activities.

Warsaw Orthopedic Inc

Warsaw Orthopedic Inc, based in Warsaw, Indiana, holds over 1,800 patents related to spinal implants and surgery devices, with approximately 200 patents in progress. The company focuses on innovations in spinal fusion devices and biologic solutions, aiming to improve surgical outcomes and patient recovery through strategic patent filings.

Globus Medical Inc

Globus Medical Inc, headquartered in Audubon, Pennsylvania, has filed over 1,500 patents in the spinal implants and surgery devices sector, with around 180 patents currently in progress. The company specializes in minimally invasive technologies and smart implant systems, enhancing surgical precision and patient care efficacy.

Other key players in the industry include Medtronic Inc, and Depuy Synthes Products Inc.

Key Questions Answered in the Global Spinal Implants and Surgery Devices Patent Landscape Report
  • What are spinal implants and surgery devices, and how do they benefit patients with spinal disorders?
  • What is the current state of the global patent landscape for spinal implants and surgery devices?
  • Which companies are leading in patent filings within the spinal implants and surgery devices industry?
  • What are the primary drivers of patent activity in spinal surgery technologies?
  • How do innovations in minimally invasive techniques influence the patent landscape for spinal surgery and impact surgical outcomes?
  • What role do biologic solutions play in shaping patent trends and the development of spinal implants?
  • Which regions are most active in patent filings for spinal implants and surgery devices, and why?
  • How are smart implants influencing the future of spinal surgery?
  • What future trends are anticipated in the spinal implants and surgery devices patent landscape?
  • How do jurisdictional differences affect the patent landscape for spinal implants and surgery devices?
  • What challenges do companies face in securing patents for spinal surgery technologies?
  • How are hospitals and orthopedic centres adapting to innovations in spinal implants?
  • What impact does regulatory compliance have on patent filings in the spinal implants and surgery devices industry?
  • How does the integration of AI and data analytics enhance the functionality of spinal surgery devices?
Reasons to Purchase this Report

The report offers an in-depth analysis of the patent landscape, covering key trends, technological advancements, and regional insights. It provides detailed segmentation and highlights areas of significant innovation and activity. By examining leading companies' strategies and patent portfolios, the report elucidates competitive dynamics and emerging opportunities. Stakeholders will gain valuable information for strategic decision-making, ensuring they stay ahead in the evolving industry. This comprehensive coverage makes it an essential resource for understanding the industry's future direction.


1 Introduction
2 Executive Summary
3 Global Therapeutic mRNA Market Overview
3.1 Global Therapeutic mRNA Market Historical Value (2017-2023)
3.2 Global Therapeutic mRNA Market Forecast Value (2024-2032)
4 Global Therapeutic mRNA Market Segmentation
4.1 Global Therapeutic mRNA Market Share by Design
4.1.1 Market Overview
4.1.2 Self-Amplifying mRNA
4.1.3 Conventional Non-Amplifying mRNA
4.2 Global Therapeutic mRNA Market Share by Route of Administration
4.2.1 Market Overview
4.2.2 Intravenous
4.2.3 Intramuscular
4.2.4 Others
4.3 Global Therapeutic mRNA Market Share by Indication
4.3.1 Market Overview
4.3.2 Oncology
4.3.3 Infectious Diseases
4.3.4 Autoimmune Diseases
4.3.5 Others
5 Global Market Dynamics
5.1 Market Drivers and Constraints
5.2 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
5.3 PESTEL Analysis
5.4 Industry Events, Initiatives, and Trends
5.5 Value Chain Analysis
6 Global Therapeutic mRNA Patent Landscape Analysis
6.1 Patent Distribution by Publication Year
6.2 Patent Distribution by Application Year
6.3 Patent Distribution by Priority Year
6.4 Analysis by Type of Patent
6.4.1 Granted Patents
6.4.2 Patent Application
6.4.3 Amended Application
6.4.4 Search Report
6.5 Analysis by Legal Status
6.5.1 Active
6.5.2 Pending
6.5.3 Expired/Discontinued
6.6 Analysis by Patent Jurisdiction
6.7 Analysis by Patent Age
6.8 Analysis by Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) Codes
6.9 Average Time to Publish a Patent
6.9.1 By Entities
6.9.2 By Jurisdiction
6.9.3 By Technology
6.10 Analysis by Type of Entity (Academic and Non-Academic)
6.11 Analysis by Top Applicants
6.12 Analysis by Top Inventors
7 Global Therapeutic mRNA Patent Analysis by Technology
7.1 Total Patents by Top Technologies
7.2 Time Evolution of Patents by Technology
7.3 Emerging Technologies
7.4 Patent Segmentation, By mRNA Design
7.4.1 Time Evolution by Number of Patents
7.4.2 Time Evolution by Number of Patent Families
7.4.3 Analysis by Type of Entity (Academic vs Non-Academic)
7.4.4 Analysis by Top Applicants
7.4.5 Analysis by Top Inventors
7.5 Patent Segmentation, By mRNA Delivery
*Complete technology list will be provided in the report.
8 EMR Patent Valuation Analysis
8.1 Assessment Methodology
8.2 High Value Patents
8.3 Medium Value Patents
8.4 Low Value Patents
9 Global Therapeutic mRNA – Top 10 Players Patent Analysis
9.1 Top 10 Entities by Number of Patents
9.2 Analysis by Publication Year
9.3 Analysis by Application Year
9.4 Analysis by Priority Year
9.5 Analysis by Type of Patent
9.6 Analysis by Jurisdiction
9.7 Analysis by Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) Codes
9.8 Analysis by Source of Innovation
9.9 Analysis by Forward and Backward Citations
9.10 Analysis by Legal Status
9.11 Analysis by Patent Age
9.12 Analysis by Key Inventors
9.13 Entity Dynamics
9.13.1 Analysis by Type of Player (Academic vs Non-Academic)
9.13.2 Analysis by Collaboration
9.13.3 Analysis by Technology
9.13.4 Newcomers
9.13.4.1 Start-up Companies
9.13.4.2 Established Companies
10 Patent Profile of Key Players
10.1 Pfizer, Inc .
10.1.1 Product Portfolio
10.1.2 Patent Portfolio by Patent Families
10.1.3 Time Evolution of Patents
10.1.4 Geographical Patent Coverage
10.1.5 Patent Analysis by Technology
10.1.6 Patent News and Developments
10.1.7 Financial Analysis
10.1.8 SWOT Analysis
10.2 Novartis AG
10.3 Genentech Inc.
10.4 Amgen Inc.
10.5 Regeneron Pharma
11 Future Trends
12 Global Therapeutic mRNA Landscape (Additional Insight)*
12.1 Global Therapeutic mRNA: Developers Landscape
12.1.1 Analysis by Year of Establishment
12.1.2 Analysis by Company Size
12.1.3 Analysis by Region
12.2 Global Therapeutic mRNA: Product Landscape
12.2.1 Analysis by Type
12.2.2 Analysis by Route of Administration
12.2.3 Analysis by Therapeutic Area
*Additional insights are not provided in the standard report.

Download our eBook: How to Succeed Using Market Research

Learn how to effectively navigate the market research process to help guide your organization on the journey to success.

Download eBook
Cookie Settings