Global Allogeneic CAR-T Cell Patent Landscape Report and Forecast 2024-2032

Global Allogeneic CAR-T Cell Patent Landscape Report and Forecast 2024-2032


iency, while workstations have approximately 150 patents targeting AI integration and enhanced data analysis. Future opportunities lie in AI-driven diagnostics and multifunctional capabilities, making capsule endoscopy an attractive, non-invasive diagnostic tool set to drive significant industryindustry growth and adoption.

Analysis by Disease
  • Obscure GI Tract Bleeding
  • Crohn’s Disease
  • Small Intestine Tumor
  • Others
The capsule endoscopy patent landscape, segmented by disease applications, is led by patents targeting obscure GI tract bleeding, with over 150 patents focusing on improved imaging and localisation technologies. Crohn’s disease patents, around 100 in number, emphasise enhanced diagnostic accuracy and patient monitoring. Small intestine tumor patents, numbering approximately 80, highlight advancements in early detection and precision imaging. The 'others' category, with about 70 patents, covers various gastrointestinal conditions, driving comprehensive diagnostic solutions. Future enhancements include advanced AI integration for more accurate diagnostics, ensuring continued innovation and robust industry growth, and making capsule endoscopy a preferred non-invasive diagnostic tool.

Analysis by End User
  • Hospital
  • Speciality Clinics
  • Others
The capsule endoscopy patent landscape, segmented by end user, is led by hospitals with over 200 patents, focusing on integrating advanced imaging and diagnostic systems for large-scale, efficient use. Speciality clinics follow with around 150 patents targeting portable, user-friendly devices to enhance patient experience and diagnostic accuracy. The 'others' segment, with about 100 patents, covers various healthcare settings, emphasising versatility and adaptability. Future enhancements include further miniaturisation, AI integration, and improved biocompatibility, ensuring broader adoption and significant industry growth. This makes capsule endoscopy a preferred choice for non-invasive, efficient, and accurate diagnostics across diverse medical settings.

Capsule Endoscopy Patent Jurisdiction Analysis

The diverse patent landscape in the United States, Asia Pacific reflects regional innovation trends and competitive dynamics, providing insight into the growth and focus areas of capsule endoscopy technologies worldwide.
  • In the United States, the patent landscape for capsule endoscopy is highly active, with over 500 patents already filed. Currently, more than 50 companies are actively engaged in patenting new technologies, with ongoing advancements in imaging, data transmission, and capsule design. The US continues to dominate the patent landscape, showcasing its strong emphasis on medical technology development and intellectual property protection.
  • Around 300 patents for capsule endoscopy have been filed in the Asia Pacific region, with Japan and China leading the way. Companies like Shenzhen Zifu Technology, Toshiba, and FUJIFILM Holdings Corporation are at the forefront. The region's growing healthcare sector and advancements in medical technology are driving this patent activity, indicating its increasing significance as an innovation hub for capsule endoscopy technologies.
Patent Profile of Key Companies

Key players influence global capsule endoscopy patent landscape with innovation and technology advancements through extensive patent filings, revealing industry insights.

Olympus Corp.: Established in 1919 in Tokyo, Japan, Olympus Corporation holds over 150 patents for capsule endoscopy. They specialise in high-resolution imaging, 3D mapping, and wireless data transmission, as well as advancements in biocompatible materials and capsule navigation technologies.

Shenzhen Zifu Technology: Founded in 2011 in Shenzhen, China, Shenzhen Zifu Technology has filed around 50 patents in capsule endoscopy. Their innovations include mini capsules, better imaging, longer battery life, and AI integration for improved gastrointestinal exams.

Siemens AG: Siemens AG, founded in 1847 in Munich, Germany, holds over 100 patents for capsule endoscopy innovations. Their focus is on advanced imaging sensors, data processing algorithms, and wireless communication improvements. They also develop technologies to enhance capsule durability, functionality, and performance in diagnostic procedures.

Other key players in the industry include Toshiba and FUJIFILM Holdings Corporation.

Key Questions Answered in the Global Capsule Endoscopy Patent Landscape Report
  • What is the current size and growth trajectory of the global capsule endoscopy industr?
  • What are the key technological advancements driving patent filings in capsule endoscopy?
  • How are miniaturisation and wireless technology influencing the patent landscape for capsule endoscopy?
  • What role does AI integration play in the innovation and patent filings in capsule endoscopy?
  • How many patents have been filed globally for capsule endoscopy in the past decade?
  • Which regions lead in patent filings for capsule endoscopy, and what are the contributing factors?
  • How does the regulatory environment in Europe support patent activity in capsule endoscopy?
  • What are the primary areas of innovation for capsule endoscopes, recorders, and workstations?
  • How do patents targeting obscure GI tract bleeding compare with those for Crohn’s disease and small intestine tumors?
  • What challenges do companies face in ensuring high image quality and battery life for capsule endoscopy devices?
  • How do key companies like Olympus Corporation, Shenzhen Zifu Technology, and Siemens AG strategise their patent filings?
  • What future opportunities exist for enhancing capsule endoscopy through advanced AI and multifunctional capabilities?
  • How do patents for hospitals differ from those for speciality clinics in the capsule endoscopy industry?
  • What are the future trends in capsule endoscopy patent filings in the Asia Pacific region?
  • How do companies differentiate their capsule endoscopy products through unique patent features?
Reasons to Purchase this Report

This report provides strategic insights into leading companies' patent strategies and innovations, aiding in the development of your own intellectual property and R&D strategies. Understanding capsule endoscopy patents' competitive landscape allows for the identification of trends and opportunities to maintain industry leadership. Regional patent filing trends and focus areas are revealed, enabling tailored strategies for specific regionss. "
"Global Self-Amplifying RNA Vaccines Patent Landscape Report 2024

Global Self-Amplifying RNA Vaccines Industry Size

The self amplifying RNA vaccines market was valued at USD 5.8 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 13.1 million by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 9.6% from 2024-2032. The patent landscape for self-amplifying RNA (saRNA) vaccines is dynamic, with the United States leading in filings. It holds over 200 patents focused on novel delivery systems, RNA stability, and immunogenicity enhancements. Approximately 50 new patents were filed in the past year, underscoring ongoing innovation. Future growth is expected to be driven by advancements in AI for vaccine design and improved lipid nanoparticle formulations.

Patent Landscape Report Coverage

This report offers an in-depth analysis of the global self-amplifying RNA vaccines patent landscape. It explores industry size, regional patent activity, and segmentation by type, administration route, and therapeutic area. Highlighting key innovations in RNA stability and delivery systems, it profiles leading companies and addresses regulatory challenges. The report provides strategic insights and future prospects, equipping stakeholders with a comprehensive understanding of the dynamic and evolving saRNA vaccines patent landscape.

Global Self-Amplifying RNA Vaccines Patent Outlook
  • The US leads in self-amplifying RNA vaccine patents with 300 focusing on novel delivery systems and RNA stability. Europe has around 200 patents due to collaborative networks and biotech investments. Asia, China, and Japan have 150 patents showing rapid advancements despite challenges in patent laws.
  • Patents for self-amplifying RNA vaccines focus on RNA stability improvements, including chemical stability and resistance to degradation. Lipid nanoparticles play a significant role in advanced delivery systems. Other patent areas include enhancing cellular delivery, modifying RNA sequences, and incorporating adjuvants for increased immunogenicity.
  • Leading companies in the self-amplifying RNA vaccines patent landscape include Gentech Inc., with over 50 patents, Novartis AG, holding around 40 patents, and Human Genome Sciences, Inc., with approximately 30 patents. These companies are at the forefront of developing innovative delivery methods, formulations, and adjuvant technologies. Other notable contributors include Immatics Biotechnologies GmbH and Broad Institute Inc.
Self-Amplifying RNA Vaccines Introduction

Self-amplifying RNA (saRNA) vaccines represent a cutting-edge advancement in biotechnology, leveraging the ability of RNA to replicate itself within the body to enhance immune responses. Unlike traditional vaccines, saRNA vaccines require smaller doses to achieve effective immunisation, making them highly efficient. They are designed to provide rapid, robust, and long-lasting immunity by encoding both the target antigen and the replication machinery within a single molecule. This innovative approach not only improves vaccine efficacy but also facilitates faster and more cost-effective production, offering significant potential in combating infectious diseases and beyond.
  • Patent activity in the self-amplifying RNA (saRNA) vaccine sector is driven by innovations that enhance RNA stability. These patents focus on improving the structural integrity and longevity of RNA to ensure extended effectiveness. Techniques to bolster chemical stability and resistance to degradation are pivotal, directly impacting vaccine shelf-life and efficacy.
  • The development of advanced delivery systems, such as lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), is a major driver of patent filings. These patents aim to protect RNA and facilitate efficient cellular delivery, enhancing bioavailability and vaccine effectiveness. Innovations in this area seek to optimise delivery efficiency, reduce side effects, and improve release profiles.
  • Efforts to boost immunogenicity drive significant patent activity, focusing on RNA sequence modifications and adjuvant incorporation to enhance immune responses. Patents cover methods to increase protein expression and antigen presentation, improving the vaccine's efficacy and broadening its applications across various diseases.
These drivers collectively shape a vibrant and rapidly advancing patent landscape in the self-amplifying RNA vaccine sector, heralding substantial innovations and broader utilisation in the coming years.

Global Self-Amplifying RNA Vaccines Patent Segmentation Analysis

The report provides an in-depth analysis of the patents in this field by the following segmentation -

Analysis by Application
  • Oncology
  • SARS-Cov-2
  • Hepatitis
  • HIV
  • Influenza
  • Veterinary
The self-amplifying RNA vaccines patent landscape, segmented by application, is led by oncology with over 300 patents filed and 150 currently in process. SARS-CoV-2 follows with 200 patents, while hepatitis, HIV, influenza, and veterinary applications hold around 100 patents each. Challenges include regulatory hurdles and manufacturing complexities. Future prospects are promising, driven by technological advancements and increasing demand for effective, scalable vaccination solutions.

Analysis by Carrier
  • VRP
  • LNP
  • Liposome
  • CNE
  • Polymer
The self-amplifying RNA vaccines patent landscape, segmented by carrier, is led by lipid nanoparticles (LNP) with over 250 patents filed and 100 currently in process. Viral replicon particles (VRP) follow with 200 patents, while liposomes, CNE, and polymers each have around 100 patents. Challenges include optimising delivery efficiency and stability. Future prospects are promising, driven by advancements in carrier technologies and the growing demand for effective, scalable vaccine solutions.

Self-Amplifying RNA Vaccines Patent Jurisdiction Analysis

Self-amplifying RNA (saRNA) vaccines are a cutting-edge biotechnology, offering enhanced immunogenicity and scalable production. Patent activity indicates significant innovation and advancements. Jurisdictional analysis reveals geographical trends and highlights leading regions in this field, showcasing the global landscape of saRNA vaccine development and technological progress.
  • The United States leads the self-amplifying RNA vaccines patent landscape with over 300 patents filed. This dominance is attributed to the country’s robust innovation ecosystem and supportive regulatory environment. American biotech firms and research institutions are at the forefront, driving advancements in vaccine delivery and efficacy. However, navigating the complex US patent laws and FDA regulations remains a challenge for innovators.
  • Europe follows closely with around 200 patents filed. Significant investments in biotechnology and strong collaborative networks among European countries have propelled this region’s leadership in saRNA vaccine innovation. The European Patent Office (EPO) provides a streamlined process for securing patents across multiple member states, though varying national regulations can pose hurdles. Ongoing efforts aim to harmonise these regulations to facilitate easier industry entry and development.
  • In Asia, China and Japan are major players with around 150 patents. China's rapid biotech advancements and Japan's established pharmaceutical industry drive this activity. Substantial government support in China and Japan's focus on refining saRNA delivery methods highlight their innovation. Both face challenges in aligning patent laws with international standards but continue to advance significantly.
Patent Profile of Key Companies

The patent landscape for self-amplifying RNA vaccines is shaped by several key companies driving innovation and securing intellectual property. Here is an overview of their patent activities.

Gentech Inc.

Established in 1976 and headquartered in South San Francisco, California, USA, Gentech Inc. has filed over 50 patents in self-amplifying RNA vaccines. They are innovating in delivery methods, formulations, and adjuvant technologies, aiming to significantly enhance the future patent landscape by improving vaccine stability, efficacy, and overall immunogenic response to better combat infectious diseases.

Novartis AG

Founded in 1996 and based in Basel, Switzerland, Novartis AG holds around 40 patents in the self-amplifying RNA vaccines domain. Their focus is on developing novel adjuvants, scalable production techniques, and optimising immune response.

Human Genome Sciences, Inc.

Established in 1992 with headquarters in Rockville, Maryland, USA, Human Genome Sciences, Inc. has approximately 30 patents in self-amplifying RNA vaccines. They are pioneering targeted delivery systems, enhanced immunogenicity solutions, and personalised vaccine approaches. Additionally, they focus on improving vaccine stability and scalability, contributing to future innovations and substantial patent growth in this rapidly evolving field.

Other key players in the industry include Immatics Biotechnologies GmbH and Broad Institute Inc.

Key Questions Answered in the Global Self-Amplifying RNA Vaccines Patent Landscape Report
  • What is the current size of the self-amplifying RNA vaccines patent landscape?
  • Which regions lead in patent filings for saRNA vaccines?
  • How many patents have been filed by Gentech Inc., Novartis AG, and Human Genome Sciences, Inc.?
  • What are the main challenges faced in the development and distribution of saRNA vaccines?
  • How are regulatory hurdles impacting the saRNA vaccine patent landscape?
  • What future advancements are expected to drive the saRNA vaccines patent landscape?
  • What is the patent activity in the United States, Europe, and Asia?
  • How does the patent landscape differ by route of administration?
  • What therapeutic areas are most targeted by saRNA vaccine patents?
  • How are innovation by key companies contributing to patent landscape for saRNA vaccines?
  • What strategies can stakeholders employ to navigate the complex patent landscape?
  • How do patent strategies impact competitive advantage?
  • What are the implications of patent filings in self-amplifying RNA vaccines?
  • What are the challenges and opportunities in the self-amplifying RNA vaccine patent landscape?
  • What are the regulatory and legal considerations impacting patent landscape for self-amplifying RNA vaccines patent landscape?
  • What technological innovations have recently emerged in self-amplifying RNA vaccines influencing patent landscape?
Reasons to Purchase this Report

This report provides comprehensive insights into the global self-amplifying RNA vaccines patent landscape, highlighting key regions and companies driving innovation. It covers patent filings, technological advancements, regulatory challenges, and prospects. By understanding these dynamics, stakeholders can make informed decisions, identify collaboration opportunities, and strategize for industry entry and growth, ensuring a competitive edge in the evolving saRNA vaccine market."
"mRNA Cancer Therapeutics Patent Landscape Report 2024

mRNA Cancer Therapeutics Industry Size

The mRNA cancer therapeutics market was valued at USD 13.23 billion in 2023. It is expected to grow at a CAGR of 14.6% during the forecast period of 2024-2032 and attain a market value of USD 45 billion by 2032. The patent landscape reflects the growth, showcasing innovations in treatment protocols, manufacturing processes, and immune rejection strategies, underscoring the sector’s dynamic advancements and competitive development.

Patent Landscape Report Coverage

The report provides a detailed analysis of the mRNA cancer therapeutics patent landscape, focusing on key elements influencing landscape dynamics. It covers jurisdictional trends, with insights into patent activity in the United States, Europe, and Asia. The report also highlights major companies shaping the field, such as Pfizer, Moderna, and Novartis, detailing their contributions and patent portfolios. Additionally, it examines critical drivers of innovation, including advancements in mRNA stability, delivery systems, and immunogenicity. By exploring these factors, the report offers a comprehensive overview of technological progress and competitive developments in mRNA cancer therapeutics.

mRNA Cancer Therapeutics Patent Outlook
  • The US has over 350 mRNA cancer therapeutics patents due to innovation and regulations. Europe has around 250 patents from collaborations and investments. Asia, mainly China and Japan, has approximately 150 patents due to progress and support.
  • Key players in the patent landscape include Pfizer, Inc., with over 200 patents focusing on mRNA stability and delivery systems; Moderna, Inc., holding around 300 patents for lipid nanoparticle delivery and mRNA optimisation; and Novartis AG, with approximately 150 patents on adjuvants and scalable production techniques, driving innovation in mRNA cancer therapeutics.
  • Advancements in mRNA stability, delivery systems using lipid nanoparticles and polymer-based carriers, and RNA sequence modifications with immunostimulatory adjuvants enhance immune responses against cancer cells.
mRNA Cancer Therapeutics Introduction

mRNA cancer therapeutics represent a groundbreaking approach in oncology, using messenger RNA to instruct cells to produce proteins that target and destroy cancer cells. This innovative method offers precise, personalised treatments with fewer side effects compared to traditional therapies. By leveraging the body's own cellular machinery, mRNA therapeutics can elicit strong immune responses, providing robust and adaptable cancer treatment options that hold significant promise for improving patient outcomes and advancing cancer care.
  • Patent activity in mRNA cancer therapeutics is significantly driven by innovations in enhancing mRNA stability. Patents focus on chemical modifications, such as incorporating pseudouridine and 5-methylcytosine, to improve the structural integrity and longevity of mRNA. These modifications help prevent degradation and ensure sustained protein expression in cancer cells, which is crucial for maintaining therapeutic efficacy and reducing the frequency of dosing, thereby directly impacting the patent landscape.
  • The development of advanced delivery systems is a major driver of patent activity in mRNA cancer therapeutics. Patents in this domain focus on lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), liposomes, and polymer-based carriers to protect mRNA and facilitate efficient cellular delivery. Innovations include targeting ligands and PEGylation to enhance delivery efficiency, minimise off-target effects, and improve the bioavailability of mRNA therapeutics. These advancements ensure precise delivery to cancer cells, boosting therapeutic effectiveness and expanding the patent landscape.
  • Efforts to enhance immunogenicity are pivotal in driving patent activity in mRNA cancer therapeutics. Patents cover RNA sequence modifications, such as optimising codon usage and incorporating immunostimulatory adjuvants, to elicit stronger immune responses against cancer cells. These innovations focus on increasing protein expression and antigen presentation, improving the vaccine's efficacy. Such advancements broaden the application of mRNA cancer treatments, making them more effective and personalised, thereby contributing significantly to the expanding patent landscape.
These drivers collectively shape a dynamic and rapidly advancing patent landscape in mRNA cancer therapeutics, heralding substantial innovations and broader utilisation. Advancements in mRNA stability, delivery systems, and immunogenicity are key factors propelling this growth, ensuring the continued evolution and impact of mRNA cancer treatments in oncology.

MRNA Cancer Therapeutics Patent Segmentation Analysis

The report provides an in-depth analysis of the patents in this field by the following segmentation.

Analysis by Type
  • Self-Amplifying mRNA Vaccines
  • Non-Amplifying mRNA Vaccines
The mRNA cancer therapeutics patent landscape, segmented by type, is led by self-amplifying mRNA vaccines with over 400 patents filed and 150 currently in process, due to their enhanced efficacy, lower dosage requirements, and ability to generate stronger immune responses. Non-amplifying mRNA vaccines hold around 250 patents. Challenges include regulatory hurdles and manufacturing complexities. Despite these, future prospects are promising, driven by technological advancements and growing demand for effective, personalised cancer treatments.

Analysis by Route of Administration
  • Intravenous
  • Intramuscular
  • Others
The mRNA cancer therapeutics patent landscape, segmented by route of administration, is led by intravenous administration with over 300 patents filed and 100 currently in process, due to its effectiveness in delivering precise doses directly to the bloodstream. Intramuscular routes have around 200 patents. This route leads due to its established use in clinical settings and ability to ensure rapid bioavailability. Future advancements focus on improving patient compliance and minimising side effects.

Analysis by Therapeutic Area
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Oncology
  • Others
The mRNA cancer therapeutics patent landscape, segmented by therapeutic area, is led by oncology with over 500 patents filed and 200 currently in process. Infectious diseases follow with around 300 patents. The focus on oncology is due to its potential for significant impact on patient outcomes. Future prospects, are supported by expanding research funding, collaborative efforts, and advancements in personalised medicine, promising robust growth in this sector.

mRNA Cancer Therapeutics Patent Jurisdiction Analysis

The mRNA cancer therapeutics patent landscape shows significant activity across key jurisdictions. The United States leads with over 350 patents, driven by a strong innovation ecosystem and supportive regulatory framework. Europe follows with around 250 patents, benefitting from robust collaborative networks and significant biotech investments. Asia, particularly China and Japan, accounts for approximately 150 patents, reflecting rapid advancements and substantial government support. Each region faces challenges in harmonising patent laws and navigating regulatory complexities, but ongoing efforts in international collaboration and standardisation are expected to streamline processes, fostering further innovation and growth in mRNA cancer therapeutics globally.

Patent Profile of Key Companies

The patent landscape for mRNA cancer therapeutics is shaped by several key companies driving innovation and securing intellectual property. Here is an overview of their patent activities.

Pfizer, Inc.

Pfizer, Inc. is a key player in the mRNA cancer therapeutics patent landscape, holding over 200 patents. Their focus on innovative mRNA technologies has led to significant advancements in stabilising mRNA and enhancing delivery systems. Pfizer's strong research capabilities and strategic partnerships bolster their patent portfolio, driving forward the development of effective cancer treatments.

Modernatx Inc.

Modernatx Inc. stands at the forefront of mRNA cancer therapeutics, with a robust patent portfolio of over 300 patents. Known for their pioneering work in mRNA technology, Moderna's patents cover critical areas such as lipid nanoparticle delivery systems and mRNA sequence optimisation. Their continuous innovation and extensive clinical trials underpin their leading position in this domain.

Novartis AG

Novartis AG has established a significant presence in the mRNA cancer therapeutics patent landscape, with around 150 patents. Their patents focus on novel adjuvants and scalable production techniques, aiming to improve the efficacy and accessibility of mRNA-based cancer treatments. Novartis' investment in R&D and collaborations with research institutions drive their contributions to this field.

Other key players in the industry include Genentech Inc., Immatics Biotechnologies GmbH.

Key Questions Answered in the MRNA Cancer Therapeutics Patent Landscape Report
  • What is the current industry size for mRNA cancer therapeutics?
  • What is the expected growth rate of the mRNA cancer therapeutics industry?
  • Which regions are leading in mRNA cancer therapeutics patents?
  • Which companies are most active in mRNA cancer therapeutics patents?
  • What are the key drivers of patent activity in mRNA cancer therapeutics?
  • How do self-amplifying and non-amplifying mRNA vaccines differ in patents?
  • What are the common routes of administration for mRNA cancer therapeutics?
  • Which therapeutic areas are most covered by mRNA cancer therapeutics patents?
  • What challenges exist in the patenting of mRNA cancer therapeutics?
  • How do innovations in delivery systems affect mRNA cancer therapeutics patents?
  • How do patent strategies impact competitive advantage?
  • What are the implications of patent filings in mRNA cancer therapeutics?
  • What are the challenges and opportunities in the mRNA cancer therapeutics patent landscape?
  • What are the regulatory and legal considerations?
  • What technological innovations have recently emerged in mRNA cancer therapeutics?
Reasons to Purchase this Report

This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the mRNA cancer therapeutics patent landscape, essential for understanding the current state and future trends of this innovative field. By examining patent activity across various segments, including type, route of administration, and therapeutic areas, the report highlights key drivers of growth and technological advancements. It offers valuable insights into the competitive landscape, key players, and jurisdictional trends. This information is crucial for stakeholders seeking to navigate the complexities of the mRNA industry, make informed strategic decisions, and identify opportunities for investment and collaboration in this rapidly evolving sector."
"Circulating DNA/ RNA Patent Landscape Report 2024

Circulating DNA/ RNA Industry Size

The nucleic acid-based therapeutics market was valued at USD 5.32 billion in 2023. It is expected to grow at a CAGR of 13.29% during the forecast period of 2024-2032 and attain a market value of USD 16.4 billion by 2032. The patent landscape is driven by the escalating number of advancements in next-generation sequencing, cancer biomarkers, and therapeutic delivery systems. Further, innovation in non-invasive diagnostics and personalised medicine are impacting patent landscape positively.

Patent Landscape Report Coverage

This report provides a comprehensive overview of the circulating DNA/RNA patent landscape, detailing industry size, growth projections, and key technological advancements. It examines patent activity by technology and indication, with a focus on leading regions such as the US, Europe, and Asia. The report also profiles key companies, their patent portfolios, and their impact on the industry. Insights into regulatory and legal considerations, along with emerging trends, offer a thorough understanding of the sector’s dynamics and future opportunities.

Circulating DNA/ RNA Patent Outlook
  • The United States leads with over 600 patents, followed by Europe with 400 patents. Asia, especially China and Japan, has around 250 patents, showing rapid advancements and government support.
  • Biotech firms and academic institutions are driving innovation in the circulating DNA/RNA patent landscape through extensive patent filings. Their focus on cutting-edge sequencing technologies, biomarkers, and delivery systems is crucial for advancing non-invasive diagnostics and personalised medicine.
  • The patent landscape is shaped by distinct regional advantages. The US excels due to its robust biotech infrastructure and regulatory environment, Europe benefits from extensive research collaborations and funding, while Asia’s growth is spurred by substantial government initiatives and a strong focus on biotech developments, enhancing its competitive position globally.
Circulating DNA/RNA: Introduction

Circulating DNA and RNA, found in the bloodstream, are vital biomarkers for various diagnostic applications. These fragments, released from cells into the plasma, offer non-invasive insights into a range of conditions, from cancer to genetic disorders. Their presence in the blood facilitates early disease detection, monitoring, and personalised medicine.
  • Patents on advanced next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies are revolutionising the circulating DNA/RNA landscape. These patents focus on innovations in ultra-accurate, rapid, and cost-efficient sequencing methods, enhancing the detection and analysis of circulating nucleic acids, thereby opening new avenues for non-invasive diagnostics and personalised treatment strategies.
  • The surge in cancer-related patents for circulating DNA/RNA biomarkers underscores a major landscape driver. These patents detail groundbreaking biomarkers and novel detection techniques, significantly boosting the precision and early detection capabilities of


1 Introduction
2 Executive Summary
3 Global Allogenic CAR-T Cell Market Overview
3.1 Global Allogenic CAR-T Cell Market Historical Value (2017-2023)
3.2 Global Allogenic CAR-T Cell Market Forecast Value (2024-2032)
4 Global Allogenic CAR-T Cell Market Segmentation
4.1 Global Allogenic CAR-T Cell Market Share by Type
4.1.1 Market Overview
4.1.2 Stem Cell
4.1.3 Non-Stem Cell
4.2 Global Allogenic CAR-T Cell Market Share by Target Indication
4.2.1 Market Overview
4.2.2 Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
4.2.3 Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma
4.2.4 Follicular Lymphoma
4.2.5 Large B-cell Lymphoma
4.2.6 Mantle Cell Lymphoma
4.2.7 Others
4.3 Global Allogenic CAR-T Cell Market Share by Target Antigens
4.3.1 Market Overview
4.3.2 CD19
4.3.3 BCMA
4.3.4 CD20
4.3.5 CD19/22
4.3.6 Others
5 Global Market Dynamics
5.1 Market Drivers and Constraints
5.2 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
5.3 PESTEL Analysis
5.4 Industry Events, Initiatives, and Trends
5.5 Value Chain Analysis
6 Global Allogenic CAR-T Cell Patent Landscape Analysis
6.1 Patent Distribution by Publication Year
6.2 Patent Distribution by Application Year
6.3 Patent Distribution by Priority Year
6.4 Analysis by Type of Patent
6.4.1 Granted Patents
6.4.2 Patent Application
6.4.3 Amended Application
6.4.4 Search Report
6.5 Analysis by Legal Status
6.5.1 Active
6.5.2 Pending
6.5.3 Expired/Discontinued
6.6 Analysis by Patent Jurisdiction
6.7 Analysis by Patent Age
6.8 Analysis by Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) Codes
6.9 Average Time to Publish a Patent
6.9.1 By Entities
6.9.2 By Jurisdiction
6.9.3 By Technology
6.10 Analysis by Type of Entity (Academic and Non-Academic)
6.11 Analysis by Top Applicants
6.12 Analysis by Top Inventors
7 Global Allogenic CAR-T Cell Industry Patent Analysis by Technology
7.1 Total Patents by Top Technologies
7.2 Time Evolution of Patents by Technology
7.3 Emerging Technologies
7.4 Zinc Finger Nucleases (ZFN)
7.4.1 Time Evolution by Number of Patents
7.4.2 Time Evolution by Number of Patent Families
7.4.3 Analysis by Type of Entity (Academic vs Non-Academic)
7.4.4 Analysis by Top Applicants
7.4.5 Analysis by Top Inventors
7.5 Transcription Activator-Like Effector Nucleases (TALEN)
7.5.1 Time Evolution by Number of Patents
7.5.2 Time Evolution by Number of Patent Families
7.5.3 Analysis by Type of Entity (Academic vs Non-Academic)
7.5.4 Analysis by Top Applicants
7.5.5 Analysis by Top Inventors
7.6 Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9
7.6.1 Time Evolution by Number of Patents
7.6.2 Time Evolution by Number of Patent Families
7.6.3 Analysis by Type of Entity (Academic vs Non-Academic)
7.6.4 Analysis by Top Applicants
7.6.5 Analysis by Top Inventors
*Complete Technology list will be provided in the report.
8 EMR Patent Valuation Analysis
8.1 Assessment Methodology
8.2 High Value Patents
8.3 Medium Value Patents
8.4 Low Value Patents
9 Global Allogenic CAR-T Cell – Top 10 Players Patent Analysis
9.1 Top 10 Entities by Number of Patents
9.2 Analysis by Publication Year
9.3 Analysis by Application Year
9.4 Analysis by Priority Year
9.5 Analysis by Type of Patent
9.6 Analysis by Jurisdiction
9.7 Analysis by Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) Codes
9.8 Analysis by Source of Innovation
9.9 Analysis by Forward and Backward Citations
9.10 Analysis by Legal Status
9.11 Analysis by Patent Age
9.12 Analysis by Key Inventors
9.13 Entity Dynamics
9.13.1 Analysis by Type of Player (Academic vs Non-Academic)
9.13.2 Analysis by Collaboration
9.13.3 Analysis by Technology
9.13.4 Newcomers
9.13.4.1 Start-up Companies
9.13.4.2 Established Companies
10 Patent Profile of Key Players
10.1 Artiva Biotherapeutics Inc
10.1.1 Product Portfolio
10.1.2 Patent Portfolio by Patent Families
10.1.3 Time Evolution of Patents
10.1.4 Geographical Patent Coverage
10.1.5 Patent Analysis by Technology
10.1.6 Patent News and Developments
10.1.7 Financial Analysis
10.1.8 SWOT Analysis
10.2 Poseida Therapeutics, Inc .
10.3 Nanjing Beiheng Biological Technology Co., Ltd .
10.4 NantCell, Inc .
10.5 GC Cell Corp
10.6 Bristol Mayer Squibb Company
10.7 Compugen LTD
11 Future Trends
12 Global Allogenic CAR-T Cell Market Landscape (Additional Insight)*
12.1 Global Allogenic CAR-T Cell: Developers Landscape
12.1.1 Analysis by Year of Establishment
12.1.2 Analysis by Company Size
12.1.3 Analysis by Region
12.2 Global Allogenic CAR-T Cell: Product Landscape
12.2.1 Analysis by Product Type
12.2.2 Analysis by Technology
12.2.3 Analysis by Application
*Additional insights are not provided in the standard report.

Download our eBook: How to Succeed Using Market Research

Learn how to effectively navigate the market research process to help guide your organization on the journey to success.

Download eBook
Cookie Settings