Cannabis Packaging Equipment Market- Growth, Share, Opportunities & Competitive Analysis, 2024 – 2032

Market Overview:

The Chemotherapy Induced Myelosuppression Treatment Market is projected to grow from USD 8,062.25 million in 2024 to an estimated USD 10,616.44 million by 2032, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 3.5% during the forecast period (2024-2032).

The key drivers for the growth of the chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression treatment market include the increasing incidence of cancer worldwide and the rising number of chemotherapy treatments. Myelosuppression, a common side effect of chemotherapy, leads to reduced blood cell production in the bone marrow, heightening the need for supportive therapies to manage this condition. The development of novel therapies, including growth factors and immunotherapies to mitigate myelosuppression, is further boosting the market. Additionally, the increasing focus on personalized medicine, where treatment plans are tailored to patients based on their genetic profile, is creating more targeted and effective therapies for managing chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression. Furthermore, the growing demand for improved quality of life for cancer patients, along with advancements in early diagnosis and treatment options, is driving the adoption of supportive treatments.

Market Drivers:

Advancements in Personalized Medicine:

The growing shift toward personalized medicine has accelerated the development of targeted therapies for managing chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression. For instance, in 2021, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved several targeted therapies for different types of cancer. One such example is Kymriah (tisagenlecleucel), a CAR-T cell therapy approved for certain types of leukemia. Research indicates that personalized treatments, such as CAR-T therapies, can significantly reduce side effects like myelosuppression by specifically targeting cancer cells, thereby leaving healthy cells less affected by chemotherapy. A study published by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) found that nearly 70% of patients with advanced cancers could benefit from targeted therapies, reducing adverse effects such as neutropenia, a form of myelosuppression.

Market Challenges:

High Treatment Costs and Accessibility Barriers:

A major challenge facing the chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression treatment market is the high cost of advanced therapies, especially in developing regions. Treatments such as growth factors, immunotherapies, and biologics have shown promise in managing chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression but come at a high price. This makes them less accessible to a large portion of the patient population, particularly in low- and middle-income countries with limited healthcare budgets. For example, in countries like India and Brazil, while the incidence of cancer is rising, the cost of modern myelosuppression treatments remains a significant barrier to their widespread adoption. Even in developed regions like North America, the high costs of these therapies place a strain on healthcare systems and create treatment disparities. Consequently, many patients may not receive timely or adequate treatment, leading to worsened outcomes and a decreased quality of life. This accessibility challenge represents a significant barrier to the overall growth of the market, especially in emerging economies with developing healthcare infrastructure.

Segmentations:

By Indication:

Anaemia

Neutropenia

Thrombocytopenia

By Drug Class:

Thrombopoietic Agents

Erythropoietin Stimulating Agents

Iron Supplements

Growth Factors

By Route of Administration:

Injectable

By Distribution Channel:

Hospital

Pharmacies

Specialty Clinics

Online Pharmacies

By Region:

North America: U.S., Canada, Mexico

Europe: Germany, France, U.K., Italy, Spain, Rest of Europe

Asia Pacific: China, Japan, India, South Korea, Southeast Asia, Rest of Asia Pacific

Latin America: Brazil, Argentina, Rest of Latin America

Middle East & Africa: GCC Countries, South Africa, Rest of the Middle East and Africa

Key Player Analysis:

Amgen Inc.

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company

Novartis International AG

Roche Holding AG

Sanofi S.A.

Eli Lilly and Co.

Pfizer Inc.

Gilead Sciences, Inc.

Hospira (a Pfizer company)

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd."
"Market Overview:

The Child Resistant Dropper Caps Market is projected to grow from USD 1,325 million in 2024 to an estimated USD 2,276.59 million by 2032, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 7% during the forecast period (2024-2032).

Key drivers of the market include increasing regulations and safety standards aimed at preventing accidental ingestion, particularly in the pharmaceutical, nutraceutical, and cannabis industries. As awareness of child safety grows and demand for liquid products increases across these sectors, manufacturers are focusing on innovative designs that combine convenience with enhanced safety features. These designs meet stringent regulatory requirements while ensuring accessibility for adults.

Market Drivers:

Growing Consumer Awareness of Safety:

Consumer awareness about the dangers of accidental ingestion is a key driver for the market. For example, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported that over 50,000 children under the age of five were treated for poisoning caused by household products in 2019. According to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), from 2015 to 2020, there were 3.4 million annual incidents of child exposure to hazardous substances. The CPSC's 2019 report revealed that over 1 million children had access to products that were not adequately child-resistant. This surge in incidents has increased demand for child-resistant packaging solutions, prompting companies to focus on safer, more reliable packaging technologies.

Market Challenges:

High Manufacturing Costs:

A major challenge in the child-resistant dropper caps market is the high cost of manufacturing. Developing packaging solutions that meet stringent safety regulations requires significant investment in advanced materials and production technologies. For example, incorporating innovative child-resistant mechanisms, tamper-evident features, and sustainable materials often results in higher production costs. These higher costs can impact the overall price of the product, making it more difficult for smaller manufacturers to remain competitive. Additionally, with regulatory bodies continuously updating packaging standards, manufacturers must continually invest in research and development to ensure compliance, which further adds to the financial burden. According to the U.S. Department of Commerce, the cost of meeting regulatory packaging requirements has risen by 18% over the past five years, contributing to the financial strain on producers.

Segmentations:

By Product Type:

Rim-Snap

Squeeze-and-Turn

Push-and-Turn

REL (Rotary, Easy-Lock)

Squeeze-And-Pull

By Type:

Liners

Without Liners

By Capacity:

Below 50 mL

50-75 mL

More than 75 mL

By Neck Diameter:

Below 20 mm

20-40 mm

40-60 mm

Above 60 mm

By Material:

LDPE (Low-Density Polyethylene)

PE (Polyethylene)

PP (Polypropylene)

PS (Polystyrene)

By Sales Channel:

Retail

Online Channel

Others

By Region:

North America: U.S., Canada, Mexico

Europe: Germany, France, U.K., Italy, Spain, Rest of Europe

Asia Pacific: China, Japan, India, South Korea, Southeast Asia, Rest of Asia Pacific

Latin America: Brazil, Argentina, Rest of Latin America

Middle East & Africa: GCC Countries, South Africa, Rest of the Middle East and Africa

Key Player Analysis:

Amcor PLC

Berry Global, Inc.

Alplastics, Inc.

Bericap GmbH & Co. KG

AptarGroup, Inc.

Silgan Plastics

Comar LLC

Bormioli Pharma S.p.A.

Paccor Packaging

United Caps


CHAPTER NO. 1 : INTRODUCTION
1.1.1. Report Description
Purpose of the Report
USP & Key Offerings
1.1.2. Key Benefits for Stakeholders
1.1.3. Target Audience
1.1.4. Report Scope
CHAPTER NO. 2 : EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2.1. [Cannabis Packaging Equipment Market] Snapshot
2.1.1. [Cannabis Packaging Equipment Market], 2018 - 2032 (USD Million)
CHAPTER NO. 3 : [Cannabis Packaging Equipment Market] – INDUSTRY ANALYSIS
3.1. Introduction
3.2. Market Drivers
3.3. Market Restraints
3.4. Market Opportunities
3.5. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
CHAPTER NO. 4 : ANALYSIS COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
4.1. Company Market Share Analysis – 2023
4.2. [Cannabis Packaging Equipment Market] Company Revenue Market Share, 2023
4.3. Company Assessment Metrics, 2023
4.4. Start-ups / SMEs Assessment Metrics, 2023
4.5. Strategic Developments
4.6. Key Players Product Matrix
CHAPTER NO. 5 : PESTEL & ADJACENT MARKET ANALYSIS
CHAPTER NO. 6 : [Cannabis Packaging Equipment Market] – BY [By Type] ANALYSIS
CHAPTER NO. 7 : [Cannabis Packaging Equipment Market] – BY [By Material] ANALYSIS
CHAPTER NO. 8 : [Cannabis Packaging Equipment Market] – BY [By Product] ANALYSIS
CHAPTER NO. 9 : [Cannabis Packaging Equipment Market] – BY [By Application] ANALYSIS
CHAPTER NO. 10 : [Cannabis Packaging Equipment Market] – BY [By Region] ANALYSIS
CHAPTER NO. 11 : COMPANY PROFILES
9.1. Multivac Inc.
9.1.1. Company Overview
9.1.2. Product Portfolio
9.1.3. SWOT Analysis
9.1.4. Business Strategy
9.1.5. Financial Overview
9.2. Klöckner Pentaplast Group
9.3. WestRock Company
9.4. Amcor Limited
9.5. Berry Global, Inc.
9.6. UFP Technologies
9.7. Propak Corporation
9.8. Standard Cannabis
9.9. KushCo Holdings, Inc.
9.10. Crown Holdings, Inc.

Download our eBook: How to Succeed Using Market Research

Learn how to effectively navigate the market research process to help guide your organization on the journey to success.

Download eBook
Cookie Settings