Norway Hydraulic Fracturing Market Overview, 2029

Norway Hydraulic Fracturing Market Overview, 2029


The history of Norway's hydraulic fracturing, or ""fracking,"" industry is complex and influenced by economic, technological, and environmental factors. At the beginning, Norway's search for shale gas resources followed international patterns, motivated by the prospect of both economic expansion and energy autonomy. But the nation's distinct geology and regulatory environment have had a big impact on how the fracking business has developed. When advances in horizontal drilling and fracking techniques promised to uncover hitherto unreachable hydrocarbon deposits in the early 2000s, Norway became interested in hydraulic fracturing. Potential tight oil and shale gas deposits have been found, mostly in the Barents Sea and North Sea areas, according to the Norwegian Petroleum Directorate (NPD). The goal of the early research and pilot programmes that followed this finding was to determine whether or not mining unconventional resources might be profitable. Strong rules were put in place in Norway to protect the environment and public health. Robust environmental impact evaluations, stringent approval procedures, and requirements for fracking operations' openness are all part of the nation's regulatory structure. By taking these steps, the industry hopes to reduce the hazards related to hydraulic fracturing while maintaining responsibility and compliance. Norway's fracking industry has been further influenced by the country's evolving energy strategy, which now places a higher priority on emission reductions and renewable energy sources. Investments in carbon capture technology, offshore wind, and hydropower have been redirected from fossil fuel extraction, particularly tight oil and shale gas, as part of the government's long-term energy policy.

According to the research report ""Norway Hydraulic Fracturing Market Overview, 2029,"" published by Bonafide Research, the Norway Hydraulic Fracturing market is anticipated to grow at more than 9.1% CAGR from 2024 to 2029. The growing need for energy and Norway's dedication to preserving energy security are two of the key factors propelling the country's hydraulic fracturing sector. As a major player in the world energy market, Norway is always seeking for new and better ways to produce oil and gas. The extraction of hydrocarbons from unconventional deposits—which are growing more and more important as traditional reserves diminish—requires the use of hydraulic fracturing, or fracking. Technological developments in hydraulic fracturing have facilitated the inexpensive and effective extraction of these hard-to-reach resources, supporting Norway's attempts to guarantee a steady supply of energy for sale abroad as well as for internal use. The significant expenditures made in research and development (R&D) aimed at developing environmentally friendly and sustainable fracking methods are another important factor. Norway is renowned for placing a high priority on sustainability and environmental preservation. The development of fracking techniques that reduce environmental impact—such as cutting water use, avoiding chemical pollution, and lessening seismic activity—is receiving a lot of attention. The push for more environmentally friendly fracking techniques not only supports Norway's environmental objectives but also improves public acceptance of fracking practices.

The main challenges that Norway's hydraulic fracturing market is experiencing are legislative limitations and environmental concerns. Even with technological developments, there are still concerns related to hydraulic fracturing, such excessive water consumption, seismic activity, and poisoning of groundwater. Because of these environmental effects, there are now stricter regulations and more public scrutiny. It may be difficult and time-consuming to secure the required permissions and comply with regulations in Norway, where protecting the environment is a top concern. The unstable state of the world's energy prices presents a further challenge. The hydraulic fracturing sector is extremely susceptible to changes in the price of gas and oil, which can have considerable effect on investment choices and profitability. Because hydraulic fracturing is an expensive process, it may not be financially feasible during times of low oil prices. As a result, there may be less activity and terminations. Because businesses must constantly modify their plans to account for shifting market circumstances, this volatility puts the stability and expansion of Norway's hydraulic fracturing sector at risk.

An important development in the hydraulic fracturing industry in Norway is the growing automation and digital technology integration. Fracking operations are changing as a result of the use of advanced data analytics, artificial intelligence (AI), and machine learning, which improve productivity, accuracy, and safety. Predictive maintenance and optimal resource management are made possible by these technologies, which provide real-time monitoring and analysis of fracking operations. Drilling and hydraulic fracturing process automation lowers operational risks and human error, improving output while saving money. This digital shift places Norway's hydraulic fracturing market at the forefront of technical innovation and is consistent with the country's larger industry 4.0 goals. The emphasis on environmentally friendly and low-impact fracking techniques is another new trend. The development and use of environmentally friendly hydraulic fracturing techniques is becoming more and more important due to regulatory demands and environmental concerns. Innovative techniques including recycling and reusing water, using biodegradable fracturing fluids, and using alternate water sources are becoming more popular. There is a growing trend of fracking operations utilising energy-efficient techniques to lower greenhouse gas emissions. To reducing environmental effects, this movement towards sustainability strengthens business licences and attends to stakeholder and community concerns. With Norway still leading the way in environmental stewardship, green technology and practices should become more and more of a priority for the hydraulic fracturing industry.

Among the leading firms in Norway's hydraulic fracturing market are Equinor, Aker BP, and Lundin Energy. With an emphasis on improving oil and gas recovery, Equinor, the biggest state-owned energy corporation, is a key player in both onshore and offshore hydraulic fracturing operations. In order to optimise production efficiency, Aker BP, a prominent player resulting from the merger of Det Norske Oljeselskap and BP Norge, has made major investments in cutting-edge hydraulic fracturing technology. In addition to its extensive exploration and production efforts, Lundin Energy uses cutting edge hydraulic fracturing procedures to maximise resource extraction. Together, these businesses push hydraulic fracturing sector developments and operational efficiency in Norway, trying to strike a balance between financial gains and environmental concerns.

With its concentration on offshore oil and gas production and stringent environmental restrictions, Norway has seen minimal use of the controversial hydraulic fracturing, or fracking method of producing oil and gas. It has been determined that onshore shale deposits, especially those in the northern regions of the nation like the Lofoten-Vesterålen area, might be suitable locations for hydraulic fracturing. The establishment of a hydraulic fracturing market in Norway has been substantially hindered by environmental concerns and significant popular resistance, despite the country's geological potential. Because of the government's strong focus on ecologically friendly and sustainable energy techniques, Norway has strict rules that restrict the amount of fracking that occurs there in comparison to other nations.

Understanding fluid type is essential to comprehending the various ways utilised in the hydraulic fracturing procedure in the Norway market. Because they are economical and effective in hydraulic fracturing operations, water-based fluids are the market leader. These fluids, which aid in causing cracks in the rock formations to release gas and oil, usually contain a blend of water, sand, and other chemicals. While oil-based fluids are more costly, they are recommended in some circumstances where water-based fluids might create problems, such swelling of clay. Foam-based fluids, which combine gas and water, have the benefit of improved proppant movement and less water use. Other varieties include hybrid fluids that are used to dissolve rock and increase permeability, and acid-based fluids that, in order to maximise hydraulic fracturing efficiency and environmental effect, combine the advantages of several fluid types. Hydraulic fracturing operations in Norway are dominated by fluids based on water, specifically slickwater. Slickwater is preferred over oil-based fluids because it is less expensive, more effective at transporting proppants, and has a smaller environmental effect. Water-based fluids are the favoured option in the area since they comply with Norway's strict environmental rules and dedication to sustainable energy practices.

The hydraulic fracturing market in Norway is dominated by both vertical and horizontal well types. Because they can reach bigger reservoir regions with a single wellbore, horizontal wells are becoming more and more popular as a means of achieving better production rates and more effective resource extraction. Within the oil or gas-bearing deposit, these wells are drilled horizontally after being drilled vertically to a certain depth. In comparison to horizontal wells, vertical wells are less efficient at reaching large reservoir regions, despite being easier and less expensive to dig. In situations where the geology and economics allow them, they are still employed. In Norway, horizontal wells are the most common kind of well employed in hydraulic fracturing operations. This inclination stems from horizontal drilling's capacity to increase exposure to the reservoir and, consequently, the extraction efficiency of hydrocarbons. More production rates from a single wellbore are also made possible by horizontal drilling, which is important in environmentally delicate areas like Norway since it lessens surface disturbance and the environmental impact.

The two main technological categories in the Norwegian hydraulic fracturing market are sliding sleeve techniques and plug and perf. In particular, the plug and perf technique is commonly employed in horizontal wells. Using this technique, many stages are fractured one after the other by pumping the fracturing fluid after a plug is placed and the casing is perforated at each step. This is very flexible to different geological conditions and permits fine control over the hydraulic fracturing process. In contrast, sliding sleeve technology controls the flow of fracturing fluids into particular formation portions by use of a set of sliding sleeves that are inserted in the wellbore and may be opened or closed. One benefit of this approach is that it doesn't need drilling out plugs, thus activities may continue continuously. The most popular hydraulic fracturing technology in Norway is called Plug & Perf, or plug and perforation. The intricate geology of Norway's unconventional reserves is a good fit for this method. It makes it possible to precisely target particular well zones, maximising fracture placement and enhancing total hydrocarbon recovery. In hydraulic fracturing operations in Norway, Plug & Perf is the preferred method due to its versatility and track record of improving output from horizontal wells.

The various unconventional hydrocarbon sources being exploited are highlighted by application in the hydraulic fracturing business in Norway. Because there are large shale deposits in the area, shale gas extraction is a major market. The key to releasing the gas contained in these dense shale formations is hydraulic fracturing. Another important use is tight oil, which is located in rocks with little permeability. Hydraulic fracturing makes it possible to liberate oil that would not otherwise be accessible. Similar to shale gas, tight gas is produced more efficiently using hydraulic fracturing and is found in sandstone or limestone strata. Coalbed methane (CBM) and enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) are two more forms. Extracting methane gas from coal seams is known as CBM, whereas hydraulic fracturing is used to increase the permeability of enhances the extraction of geothermal energy from geothermal reservoirs. These uses highlight the adaptability and significance of hydraulic fracturing technology in the Norwegian energy sector. In Norway, shale gas is the main application propelling the hydraulic fracturing business. The nations heightened attention on cutting carbon emissions and diversifying its energy sources has resulted in a rise in shale gas production and development. Exploiting shale gas resources is considered a calculated step towards energy security and helping the energy mix shift to one that is lower in carbon. In addition, the dominance of shale gas in the hydraulic fracturing industry is partly due to the worldwide need for greener energy sources and to Norway's technological prowess in offshore and unconventional drilling.
Considered in this report
• Historic year: 2018
• Base year: 2023
• Estimated year: 2024
• Forecast year: 2029

Aspects covered in this report
• Hydraulic Fracturing market Outlook with its value and forecast along with its segments
• Various drivers and challenges
• On-going trends and developments
• Top profiled companies
• Strategic recommendation

By Fluid Type
• Water-Based
• Oil-Based
• Foam-Based
• Others (Acid-Based Fluids and Hybrid Fluids)

By Well Type
• Horizontal
• Vertical
• By Technology
• Plug & Perf
• Sliding Sleeve

By Application
• Shale Gas
• Tight Oil
• Tight Gas
• Others (Coalbed Methane (CBM),Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS))

The approach of the report:
This report consists of a combined approach of primary and secondary research. Initially, secondary research was used to get an understanding of the market and list the companies that are present in it. The secondary research consists of third-party sources such as press releases, annual reports of companies, and government-generated reports and databases. After gathering the data from secondary sources, primary research was conducted by conducting telephone interviews with the leading players about how the market is functioning and then conducting trade calls with dealers and distributors of the market. Post this; we have started making primary calls to consumers by equally segmenting them in regional aspects, tier aspects, age group, and gender. Once we have primary data with us, we can start verifying the details obtained from secondary sources.

Intended audience
This report can be useful to industry consultants, manufacturers, suppliers, associations, and organizations related to the Hydraulic Fracturing industry, government bodies, and other stakeholders to align their market-centric strategies. In addition to marketing and presentations, it will also increase competitive knowledge about the industry.


1. Executive Summary
2. Market Structure
2.1. Market Considerate
2.2. Assumptions
2.3. Limitations
2.4. Abbreviations
2.5. Sources
2.6. Definitions
2.7. Geography
3. Research Methodology
3.1. Secondary Research
3.2. Primary Data Collection
3.3. Market Formation & Validation
3.4. Report Writing, Quality Check & Delivery
4. Norway Macro Economic Indicators
5. Market Dynamics
5.1. Market Drivers & Opportunities
5.2. Market Restraints & Challenges
5.3. Market Trends
5.3.1. XXXX
5.3.2. XXXX
5.3.3. XXXX
5.3.4. XXXX
5.3.5. XXXX
5.4. Covid-19 Effect
5.5. Supply chain Analysis
5.6. Policy & Regulatory Framework
5.7. Industry Experts Views
6. Norway Hydraulic Fracturing Market Overview
6.1. Market Size By Value
6.2. Market Size and Forecast, By Fluid Type
6.3. Market Size and Forecast, By Well Type
6.4. Market Size and Forecast, By Technology
6.5. Market Size and Forecast, By Application
7. Norway Hydraulic Fracturing Market Segmentations
7.1. Norway Hydraulic Fracturing Market, By Fluid Type
7.1.1. Norway Hydraulic Fracturing Market Size, By Water-Based, 2018-2029
7.1.2. Norway Hydraulic Fracturing Market Size, By Oil-Based, 2018-2029
7.1.3. Norway Hydraulic Fracturing Market Size, By Foam-Based, 2018-2029
7.1.4. Norway Hydraulic Fracturing Market Size, By Others, 2018-2029
7.2. Norway Hydraulic Fracturing Market, By Well Type
7.2.1. Norway Hydraulic Fracturing Market Size, By Horizontal, 2018-2029
7.2.2. Norway Hydraulic Fracturing Market Size, By Vertical, 2018-2029
7.3. Norway Hydraulic Fracturing Market, By Technology
7.3.1. Norway Hydraulic Fracturing Market Size, By Plug & Perf, 2018-2029
7.3.2. Norway Hydraulic Fracturing Market Size, By Sliding Sleeve, 2018-2029
7.4. Norway Hydraulic Fracturing Market, By Application
7.4.1. Norway Hydraulic Fracturing Market Size, By Shale Gas, 2018-2029
7.4.2. Norway Hydraulic Fracturing Market Size, By Tight Oil, 2018-2029
7.4.3. Norway Hydraulic Fracturing Market Size, By Tight Gas, 2018-2029
8. Norway Hydraulic Fracturing Market Opportunity Assessment
8.1. By Fluid Type, 2024 to 2029
8.2. By Well Type, 2024 to 2029
8.3. By Technology, 2024 to 2029
8.4. By Application, 2024 to 2029
9. Competitive Landscape
9.1. Porter's Five Forces
9.2. Company Profile
9.2.1. Company 1
9.2.1.1. Company Snapshot
9.2.1.2. Company Overview
9.2.1.3. Financial Highlights
9.2.1.4. Geographic Insights
9.2.1.5. Business Segment & Performance
9.2.1.6. Product Portfolio
9.2.1.7. Key Executives
9.2.1.8. Strategic Moves & Developments
9.2.2. Company 2
9.2.3. Company 3
9.2.4. Company 4
9.2.5. Company 5
9.2.6. Company 6
9.2.7. Company 7
9.2.8. Company 8
10. Strategic Recommendations
11. Disclaimer
List of Figures
Figure 1: Norway Hydraulic Fracturing Market Size By Value (2018, 2023 & 2029F) (in USD Million)
Figure 2: Market Attractiveness Index, By Fluid Type
Figure 3: Market Attractiveness Index, By Well Type
Figure 4: Market Attractiveness Index, By Technology
Figure 5: Market Attractiveness Index, By Application
Figure 6: Porter's Five Forces of Norway Hydraulic Fracturing Market
List of Tables
Table 1: Influencing Factors for Hydraulic Fracturing Market, 2023
Table 2: Norway Hydraulic Fracturing Market Size and Forecast, By Fluid Type (2018 to 2029F) (In USD Million)
Table 3: Norway Hydraulic Fracturing Market Size and Forecast, By Well Type (2018 to 2029F) (In USD Million)
Table 4: Norway Hydraulic Fracturing Market Size and Forecast, By Technology (2018 to 2029F) (In USD Million)
Table 5: Norway Hydraulic Fracturing Market Size and Forecast, By Application (2018 to 2029F) (In USD Million)
Table 6: Norway Hydraulic Fracturing Market Size of Water-Based (2018 to 2029) in USD Million
Table 7: Norway Hydraulic Fracturing Market Size of Oil-Based (2018 to 2029) in USD Million
Table 8: Norway Hydraulic Fracturing Market Size of Foam-Based (2018 to 2029) in USD Million
Table 9: Norway Hydraulic Fracturing Market Size of Others (2018 to 2029) in USD Million
Table 10: Norway Hydraulic Fracturing Market Size of Horizontal (2018 to 2029) in USD Million
Table 11: Norway Hydraulic Fracturing Market Size of Vertical (2018 to 2029) in USD Million
Table 12: Norway Hydraulic Fracturing Market Size of Plug & Perf (2018 to 2029) in USD Million
Table 13: Norway Hydraulic Fracturing Market Size of Sliding Sleeve (2018 to 2029) in USD Million
Table 14: Norway Hydraulic Fracturing Market Size of Shale Gas (2018 to 2029) in USD Million
Table 15: Norway Hydraulic Fracturing Market Size of Tight Oil (2018 to 2029) in USD Million
Table 16: Norway Hydraulic Fracturing Market Size of Tight Gas (2018 to 2029) in USD Million

Download our eBook: How to Succeed Using Market Research

Learn how to effectively navigate the market research process to help guide your organization on the journey to success.

Download eBook
Cookie Settings