Market Research

Minimal Residual Disease Testing Market - Global Size, Share, Trend Analysis, Opportunity and Forecast Report, 2019–2029, Segmented By Test Type (DNA-based Test, RNA-based Test, Immunological Test); By Technology (NGS, PCR, Flow Cytometry, Fluorescence In

Best Price Guarantee Length Publisher Published Date SKU
from $4,850 400 Pages BlueWeave Consulting May, 2023 BLWC17975479
Best Price Guarantee
Price from $4,850
Length 400 Pages
Publisher BlueWeave Consulting
Published Date May, 2023
SKU BLWC17975479

Minimal Residual Disease Testing Market - Global Size, Share, Trend Analysis, Opportunity and Forecast Report, 2019–2029, Segmented By Test Type (DNA-based Test, RNA-based Test, Immunological Test); By Technology (NGS, PCR, Flow Cytometry, Fluorescence In-situ Hybridization); By Application (Hematological Malignancies, Solid Tumors); By End Use (Hospitals, Specialty Clinics, Diagnostic Laboratories, Research & Academic Institutes); By Region (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Middle East and Africa)


Global Minimal Residual Disease Testing Market Size More Than Doubles to Reach USD 4 Billion by 2029

Global minimal residual disease testing market is flourishing because of high adoption of precision medicine approaches, growing trend towards early cancer diagnosis and detection, and increasing prevalence of cancer worldwide, leading to surging demand for accurate and reliable diagnostic tests.

BlueWeave Consulting, a leading strategic consulting and market research firm, in its recent study, estimated global minimal residual disease testing market size at USD 1.54 billion in 2022. During the forecast period between 2023 and 2029, BlueWeave expects global minimal residual disease testing market size to grow at a significant CAGR of 14.6% reaching a value of USD 3.96 billion by 2029. Major growth drivers for global minimal residual disease testing market include growing cancer patient population, awareness among consumers of the importance of therapy, as well as increased investments in research, and high disposable income in developing nations. A primary growth driver of the market growth is the escalating prevalence of cancer. According to the World Health Organization, cancer is currently the second most common cause of death worldwide. In 2020, there were 19.3 million reported cases of cancer and 9.96 million deaths related to the disease. The International Agency for Research on Cancer predicts that the number of cancer cases will rise to 21.9 million by 2025 and 24.6 million by 2030. As a result, governments are expected to establish new cancer screening programs to address this surge in cases. Also, the market is expected to experience growth due to increased investments in MRD (minimal residual disease) testing programs. MRD diagnostic and monitoring research is expanding, which is creating demand for these services. However, limited availability of skilled healthcare professionals to perform and interpret MRD tests and concerns over the accuracy and reliability of MRD tests are anticipated to restrain the overall market growth.

Global Minimal Residual Disease Testing Market – Overview


Global minimal residual disease (MRD) testing market refers to the market for diagnostic tests used to detect the presence of cancer cells in patients who have undergone treatment. MRD testing is a highly sensitive and specific technique that is capable of detecting small amounts of cancer cells that may remain in a patient's body after treatment. The MRD testing market includes products and services such as assays, flow cytometers, and other testing equipment, as well as related services like sample preparation and analysis. The market caters to healthcare providers, research organizations, and pharmaceutical companies who use MRD testing for disease monitoring, treatment selection, and clinical trial endpoints.

Impact of COVID-19 on Global Minimal Residual Disease Testing Market


COVID-19 had a detrimental impact on the global minimal residual disease (MRD) testing market. With the focus on the virus and the strain on healthcare systems, the demand for MRD testing was affected. The restrictions imposed due to the pandemic, such as social distancing and lockdown measures, have also resulted in delays or cancellations of elective procedures, including MRD testing. Also, the disruption in the supply chain and manufacturing processes has led to a shortage of necessary components and instruments required for testing. The uncertain economic conditions and reduced funding for research and development may further impede the growth of the MRD testing market in the near future.

Global Minimal Residual Disease Testing Market – By Test Type

Based on test type, the global minimal residual disease testing market is divided into DNA-Based Test, RNA-Based Test, and Immunological Test segments. The DNA-based tests segment held the highest share of the MRD testing market due to their high sensitivity and specificity in detecting cancer cells. However, the RNA-based tests segment is expected to grow at the highest CAGR during the forecast period due to advancements in technologies like next-generation sequencing (NGS) and digital PCR.

Competitive Landscape

Major players operating in the global minimal residual disease testing market include Abbott Laboratories, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Agilent Technologies, ARUP Laboratories, Bio-Rad Laboratories, F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Illumina, Inc., Invivoscribe, Inc., Janssen Diagnostics LLC, Luminex Corporation, Myriad Genetics, Inc., Natera, Inc., QIAGEN N.V., Sysmex Corporation, and Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. To further enhance their market share, these companies employ various strategies, including mergers and acquisitions, partnerships, joint ventures, license agreements, and new product launches.

The in-depth analysis of the report provides information about growth potential, upcoming trends, and statistics of Global Minimal Residual Disease Testing Market. It also highlights the factors driving forecasts of total market size. The report promises to provide recent technology trends in Global Minimal Residual Disease Testing Market and industry insights to help decision-makers make sound strategic decisions. Furthermore, the report also analyzes the growth drivers, challenges, and competitive dynamics of the market.


1. Research Framework
1.1. Research Objective
1.2. Product Overview
1.3. Market Segmentation
2. Executive Summary
3. Global Sustainable Labels Market Insights
3.1. Industry Value Chain Analysis
3.2. DROC Analysis
3.2.1. Growth Drivers
3.2.1.1. Increasing demand for eco-friendly and sustainable products across various industries
3.2.1.2. Growing consumer awareness and concern about environmental issues
3.2.1.3. Technological advancements in printing technology and materials
3.2.2. Restraints
3.2.2.1. Higher costs associated with sustainable label production compared to traditional labels
3.2.2.2. Complex and diverse regulatory landscape for sustainable labeling across different regions
3.2.3. Opportunities
3.2.3.1. Increasing investment in research and development of sustainable label materials and production methods
3.2.3.2. Potential growth opportunities in emerging markets
3.2.4. Challenges
3.2.4.1. Competition from traditional label manufacturers who offer lower-cost solutions
3.2.4.2. Maintaining consistency in quality of sustainable labels
3.3. Technology Advancements/Recent Developments
3.4. Regulatory Framework
3.5. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
3.5.1. Bargaining Power of Suppliers
3.5.2. Bargaining Power of Buyers
3.5.3. Threat of New Entrants
3.5.4. Threat of Substitutes
3.5.5. Intensity of Rivalry
4. Global Sustainable Labels Market Overview
4.1. Market Size & Forecast, 2019–2029
4.1.1. By Value (USD Billion)
4.2. Market Share and Forecast
4.2.1. By Material Type
4.2.1.1. Plastic
4.2.1.2. Paper
4.2.2. By Label Type
4.2.2.1. Pressure Sensitive Labels (PSL)
4.2.2.2. Shrink Labels
4.2.2.3. Stretch Labels
4.2.2.4. Wet Glue Labels
4.2.2.5. Others (In-mold, pre-gummed, etc.)
4.2.3. By Printing Technology
4.2.3.1. Flexography
4.2.3.2. Digital
4.2.3.3. Gravure
4.2.3.4. Screen
4.2.3.5. Offset
4.2.4. By End Use
4.2.4.1. Food & Beverages
4.2.4.2. Pharmaceuticals
4.2.4.3. Cosmetics & Personal Care
4.2.4.4. Homecare
4.2.4.5. Clothing & Apparels
4.2.4.6. Chemicals
4.2.5. By Region
4.2.5.1. North America
4.2.5.2. Europe
4.2.5.3. Asia Pacific (APAC)
4.2.5.4. Latin America (LATAM)
4.2.5.5. Middle East and Africa (MEA)
5. North America Sustainable Labels Market
5.1. Market Size & Forecast, 2019–2029
5.1.1. By Value (USD Billion)
5.2. Market Share & Forecast
5.2.1. By Material Type
5.2.2. By Label Type
5.2.3. By Printing Technology
5.2.4. By End Use
5.2.5. By Country
5.2.5.1. United States
5.2.5.1.1. By Material Type
5.2.5.1.2. By Label Type
5.2.5.1.3. By Printing Technology
5.2.5.1.4. By End Use
5.2.5.2. Canada
5.2.5.2.1. By Material Type
5.2.5.2.2. By Label Type
5.2.5.2.3. By Printing Technology
5.2.5.2.4. By End Use
6. Europe Sustainable Labels Market
6.1. Market Size & Forecast, 2019–2029
6.1.1. By Value (USD Billion)
6.2. Market Share & Forecast
6.2.1. By Material Type
6.2.2. By Label Type
6.2.3. By Printing Technology
6.2.4. By End Use
6.2.5. By Country
6.2.5.1. Germany
6.2.5.1.1. By Material Type
6.2.5.1.2. By Label Type
6.2.5.1.3. By Printing Technology
6.2.5.1.4. By End Use
6.2.5.2. United Kingdom
6.2.5.2.1. By Material Type
6.2.5.2.2. By Label Type
6.2.5.2.3. By Printing Technology
6.2.5.2.4. By End Use
6.2.5.3. Italy
6.2.5.3.1. By Material Type
6.2.5.3.2. By Label Type
6.2.5.3.3. By Printing Technology
6.2.5.3.4. By End Use
6.2.5.4. France
6.2.5.4.1. By Material Type
6.2.5.4.2. By Label Type
6.2.5.4.3. By Printing Technology
6.2.5.4.4. By End Use
6.2.5.5. Spain
6.2.5.5.1. By Material Type
6.2.5.5.2. By Label Type
6.2.5.5.3. By Printing Technology
6.2.5.5.4. By End Use
6.2.5.6. Belgium
6.2.5.6.1. By Material Type
6.2.5.6.2. By Label Type
6.2.5.6.3. By Printing Technology
6.2.5.6.4. By End Use
6.2.5.7. Russia
6.2.5.7.1. By Material Type
6.2.5.7.2. By Label Type
6.2.5.7.3. By Printing Technology
6.2.5.7.4. By End Use
6.2.5.8. The Netherlands
6.2.5.8.1. By Material Type
6.2.5.8.2. By Label Type
6.2.5.8.3. By Printing Technology
6.2.5.8.4. By End Use
6.2.5.9. Rest of Europe
6.2.5.9.1. By Material Type
6.2.5.9.2. By Label Type
6.2.5.9.3. By Printing Technology
6.2.5.9.4. By End Use
7. Asia-Pacific Sustainable Labels Market
7.1. Market Size & Forecast, 2019–2029
7.1.1. By Value (USD Billion)
7.2. Market Share & Forecast
7.2.1. By Material Type
7.2.2. By Label Type
7.2.3. By Printing Technology
7.2.4. By End Use
7.2.5. By Country
7.2.5.1. China
7.2.5.1.1. By Material Type
7.2.5.1.2. By Label Type
7.2.5.1.3. By Printing Technology
7.2.5.1.4. By End Use
7.2.5.2. India
7.2.5.2.1. By Material Type
7.2.5.2.2. By Label Type
7.2.5.2.3. By Printing Technology
7.2.5.2.4. By End Use
7.2.5.3. Japan
7.2.5.3.1. By Material Type
7.2.5.3.2. By Label Type
7.2.5.3.3. By Printing Technology
7.2.5.3.4. By End Use
7.2.5.4. South Korea
7.2.5.4.1. By Material Type
7.2.5.4.2. By Label Type
7.2.5.4.3. By Printing Technology
7.2.5.4.4. By End Use
7.2.5.5. Australia & New Zealand
7.2.5.5.1. By Material Type
7.2.5.5.2. By Label Type
7.2.5.5.3. By Printing Technology
7.2.5.5.4. By End Use
7.2.5.6. Indonesia
7.2.5.6.1. By Material Type
7.2.5.6.2. By Label Type
7.2.5.6.3. By Printing Technology
7.2.5.6.4. By End Use
7.2.5.7. Malaysia
7.2.5.7.1. By Material Type
7.2.5.7.2. By Label Type
7.2.5.7.3. By Printing Technology
7.2.5.7.4. By End Use
7.2.5.8. Singapore
7.2.5.8.1. By Material Type
7.2.5.8.2. By Label Type
7.2.5.8.3. By Printing Technology
7.2.5.8.4. By End Use
7.2.5.9. Vietnam
7.2.5.9.1. By Material Type
7.2.5.9.2. By Label Type
7.2.5.9.3. By Printing Technology
7.2.5.9.4. By End Use
7.2.5.10. Rest of APAC
7.2.5.10.1. By Material Type
7.2.5.10.2. By Label Type
7.2.5.10.3. By Printing Technology
7.2.5.10.4. By End Use
8. Latin America Sustainable Labels Market
8.1. Market Size & Forecast, 2019–2029
8.1.1. By Value (USD Billion)
8.2. Market Share & Forecast
8.2.1. By Material Type
8.2.2. By Label Type
8.2.3. By Printing Technology
8.2.4. By End Use
8.2.5. By Country
8.2.5.1. Brazil
8.2.5.1.1. By Material Type
8.2.5.1.2. By Label Type
8.2.5.1.3. By Printing Technology
8.2.5.1.4. By End Use
8.2.5.2. Mexico
8.2.5.2.1. By Material Type
8.2.5.2.2. By Label Type
8.2.5.2.3. By Printing Technology
8.2.5.2.4. By End Use
8.2.5.3. Argentina
8.2.5.3.1. By Material Type
8.2.5.3.2. By Label Type
8.2.5.3.3. By Printing Technology
8.2.5.3.4. By End Use
8.2.5.4. Peru
8.2.5.4.1. By Material Type
8.2.5.4.2. By Label Type
8.2.5.4.3. By Printing Technology
8.2.5.4.4. By End Use
8.2.5.5. Rest of LATAM
8.2.5.5.1. By Material Type
8.2.5.5.2. By Label Type
8.2.5.5.3. By Printing Technology
8.2.5.5.4. By End Use
9. Middle East & Africa Sustainable Labels Market
9.1. Market Size & Forecast, 2019–2029
9.1.1. By Value (USD Billion)
9.2. Market Share & Forecast
9.2.1. By Material Type
9.2.2. By Label Type
9.2.3. By Printing Technology
9.2.4. By End Use
9.2.5. By Country
9.2.5.1. Saudi Arabia
9.2.5.1.1. By Material Type
9.2.5.1.2. By Label Type
9.2.5.1.3. By Printing Technology
9.2.5.1.4. By End Use
9.2.5.2. UAE
9.2.5.2.1. By Material Type
9.2.5.2.2. By Label Type
9.2.5.2.3. By Printing Technology
9.2.5.2.4. By End Use
9.2.5.3. Qatar
9.2.5.3.1. By Material Type
9.2.5.3.2. By Label Type
9.2.5.3.3. By Printing Technology
9.2.5.3.4. By End Use
9.2.5.4. Kuwait
9.2.5.4.1. By Material Type
9.2.5.4.2. By Label Type
9.2.5.4.3. By Printing Technology
9.2.5.4.4. By End Use
9.2.5.5. South Africa
9.2.5.5.1. By Material Type
9.2.5.5.2. By Label Type
9.2.5.5.3. By Printing Technology
9.2.5.5.4. By End Use
9.2.5.6. Nigeria
9.2.5.6.1. By Material Type
9.2.5.6.2. By Label Type
9.2.5.6.3. By Printing Technology
9.2.5.6.4. By End Use
9.2.5.7. Algeria
9.2.5.7.1. By Material Type
9.2.5.7.2. By Label Type
9.2.5.7.3. By Printing Technology
9.2.5.7.4. By End Use
9.2.5.8. Rest of MEA
9.2.5.8.1. By Material Type
9.2.5.8.2. By Label Type
9.2.5.8.3. By Printing Technology
9.2.5.8.4. By End Use
10. Competitive Landscape
10.1. List of Key Players and Their Offerings
10.2. Global Sustainable Labels Market Share Analysis, 2022
10.3. Competitive Benchmarking, By Operating Parameters
10.4. Key Strategic Developments (Mergers, Acquisitions, Partnerships, etc.)
11. Impact of Covid-19 on India Worm Gear Reducers Market
12. Company Profile (Company Overview, Financial Matrix, Competitive Landscape, Key Personnel, Key Competitors, Contact Address, Strategic Outlook, SWOT Analysis)
12.1. Avery Dennison Corporation
12.2. CCL Industries Inc.
12.3. UPM Raflatac
12.4. Multi-Color Corporation
12.5. 3M Company
12.6. Innovia Films Ltd.
12.7. Coveris Holdings S.A.
12.8. Constantia Flexibles Group GmbH
12.9. Henkel AG & Co. KGaA
12.10. Lintec Corporation
12.11. Mondi Group
12.12. Dunmore Corporation
12.13. Reflex Labels Ltd.
12.14. Green Bay Packaging Inc.
12.15. Fuji Seal International Inc.
12.16. Other Prominent Players
13. Key Strategic Recommendations
14. Research Methodology
14.1. Qualitative Research
14.1.1. Primary & Secondary Research
14.2. Quantitative Research
14.3. Market Breakdown & Data Triangulation
14.3.1. Secondary Research
14.3.2. Primary Research
14.4. Breakdown of Primary Research Respondents, By Region
14.5. Assumptions & Limitations

$4,850
$5,750
$8,150

Research Assistance

US: 800.298.5699
Int'l: +1.240.747.3093
Live help
Download our eBook: How to Succeed Using Market Research

Learn how to effectively navigate the market research process to help guide your organization on the journey to success.

Download eBook

Other tasks

Cookie Settings