Structural Health Monitoring Market by Offering (Hardware, Services, Software), Technology (Wired Structural Health Monitoring, Wireless Structural Health Monitoring), Vertical - Global Forecast 2024-2030

Structural Health Monitoring Market by Offering (Hardware, Services, Software), Technology (Wired Structural Health Monitoring, Wireless Structural Health Monitoring), Vertical - Global Forecast 2024-2030


The Structural Health Monitoring Market size was estimated at USD 4.31 billion in 2023 and expected to reach USD 4.83 billion in 2024, at a CAGR 12.64% to reach USD 9.92 billion by 2030.

Global Structural Health Monitoring Market

The structural health monitoring (SHM) market comprises solutions, services, and technologies utilized for assessing and analyzing the health and performance of structures such as buildings, bridges, dams, and industrial equipment. It involves various methods and tools to detect and monitor the integrity of these structures to ensure safety and maintain operational efficiency. SHM applications are broad, including civil infrastructure, aerospace, energy utilities, and more, where monitoring structural integrity is crucial. End-users range from construction companies, government bodies responsible for public safety, to industries that rely heavily on maintaining their asset integrity for operational continuity. New opportunities in the SHM market are emerging with advancements in technology. The integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning for predictive analysis, increased use of drones for critical inspections, and the development of advanced materials and sensors are creating new prospects for growth. The increasing need to maintain aging infrastructure, coupled with technological leaps in smart sensors and IoT, is bolstering the demand for SHM systems. Compliance with stringent safety regulations and the pressing need for disaster risk mitigation are further catalyzing market expansion. Although high initial costs, technical complexities, data management challenges, and reluctance to move away from traditional practices pose obstacles, the market presents notable opportunities. Innovations in wireless sensor networks, enhanced data analysis software, advancements in material science, and the standardization of SHM protocols are areas primed for development. These innovations are critical for businesses looking to lead in the SHM market, ensuring the enduring safety and functionality of essential structures across diverse sectors such as civil infrastructure, aerospace, and energy utilities.

Regional Insights

The United States, Canada remain at the forefront with its aging infrastructure and the increasing frequency of natural disasters, there is a high demand for SHM systems. The U.S. government invests significantly in infrastructure maintenance, alongside private sector participation, which fuels the growth of SHM services. Consumers show a higher preference for advanced technologies such as wireless sensor networks and IoT integrations in SHM solutions. European Union (EU) countries have shown a proactive approach in the adoption of SHM. Initiatives for smart cities and sustainable infrastructure advocate the use of SHM systems. European consumers and governments prefer environmentally friendly and energy-efficient systems, creating demand for green SHM solutions. The Asia Pacific region exhibits a fast-growing SHM market due to rapid urbanization, expanding infrastructure, and high occurrence of natural disasters. Countries such as China, Japan, and India present diverse opportunities and challenges, owing to vast infrastructure projects driving the demand for high-quality SHM systems. The Chinese government is implementing strict building codes and regulations that mandate the use of SHM technologies.

FPNV Positioning Matrix

The FPNV Positioning Matrix is pivotal in evaluating the Structural Health Monitoring Market. It offers a comprehensive assessment of vendors, examining key metrics related to Business Strategy and Product Satisfaction. This in-depth analysis empowers users to make well-informed decisions aligned with their requirements. Based on the evaluation, the vendors are then categorized into four distinct quadrants representing varying levels of success: Forefront (F), Pathfinder (P), Niche (N), or Vital (V).

Market Share Analysis

The Market Share Analysis is a comprehensive tool that provides an insightful and in-depth examination of the current state of vendors in the Structural Health Monitoring Market. By meticulously comparing and analyzing vendor contributions in terms of overall revenue, customer base, and other key metrics, we can offer companies a greater understanding of their performance and the challenges they face when competing for market share. Additionally, this analysis provides valuable insights into the competitive nature of the sector, including factors such as accumulation, fragmentation dominance, and amalgamation traits observed over the base year period studied. With this expanded level of detail, vendors can make more informed decisions and devise effective strategies to gain a competitive edge in the market.

Key Company Profiles

The report delves into recent significant developments in the Structural Health Monitoring Market, highlighting leading vendors and their innovative profiles. These include Acellent Technologies Inc., AVT Reliability Ltd., Beanair GmbH, Bridge Diagnostics, Campbell Scientific, Inc., COWI A/S, Digitexx Data Systems, Inc., ElastiSense, FEAC Engineering P.C., First Sensor AG by TE Connectivity Ltd., Geocomp, Inc., Geokon, Geomotion (Singapore) Pte Ltd., Hottinger Brüel & Kjaer GmbH, ignaGuard, LLC, Infibra Technologies Srl, James Fisher and Sons PLC, KDM Engineers [India] Pvt. Ltd., Kinemetrics, Inc., Nova Ventures Group Corp., Rst Instruments Ltd., Sensuron LLC, Setpoint Technologies Ltd., SGS S.A., SHM Canada Consulting Limited, Sisgeo Srl, SITES AFLA (Pty) Ltd., Sixense Group, Sodis Lab, Somni Solutions, and Xylem Inc..

Market Segmentation & Coverage

This research report categorizes the Structural Health Monitoring Market to forecast the revenues and analyze trends in each of the following sub-markets:

Offering
Hardware
Sensors
Accelerometers
Corrosion Sensors
Displacement Sensors
Inclinometers and Tiltmeters
Strain Gauges
Temperature Sensors
Services
Post-Installation
Pre-Installation
Software
Technology
Wired Structural Health Monitoring
Wireless Structural Health Monitoring
Vertical
Aerospace & Defence
Civil Infrastructure
Energy
Mining
Region
Americas
Argentina
Brazil
Canada
Mexico
United States
California
Florida
Illinois
New York
Ohio
Pennsylvania
Texas
Asia-Pacific
Australia
China
India
Indonesia
Japan
Malaysia
Philippines
Singapore
South Korea
Taiwan
Thailand
Vietnam
Europe, Middle East & Africa
Denmark
Egypt
Finland
France
Germany
Israel
Italy
Netherlands
Nigeria
Norway
Poland
Qatar
Russia
Saudi Arabia
South Africa
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Turkey
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom

The report offers valuable insights on the following aspects:

1. Market Penetration: It presents comprehensive information on the market provided by key players.
2. Market Development: It delves deep into lucrative emerging markets and analyzes the penetration across mature market segments.
3. Market Diversification: It provides detailed information on new product launches, untapped geographic regions, recent developments, and investments.
4. Competitive Assessment & Intelligence: It conducts an exhaustive assessment of market shares, strategies, products, certifications, regulatory approvals, patent landscape, and manufacturing capabilities of the leading players.
5. Product Development & Innovation: It offers intelligent insights on future technologies, R&D activities, and breakthrough product developments.

The report addresses key questions such as:

1. What is the market size and forecast of the Structural Health Monitoring Market?
2. Which products, segments, applications, and areas should one consider investing in over the forecast period in the Structural Health Monitoring Market?
3. What are the technology trends and regulatory frameworks in the Structural Health Monitoring Market?
4. What is the market share of the leading vendors in the Structural Health Monitoring Market?
5. Which modes and strategic moves are suitable for entering the Structural Health Monitoring Market?

Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year


1. Preface
1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.3. Years Considered for the Study
1.4. Currency & Pricing
1.5. Language
1.6. Limitations
1.7. Assumptions
1.8. Stakeholders
2. Research Methodology
2.1. Define: Research Objective
2.2. Determine: Research Design
2.3. Prepare: Research Instrument
2.4. Collect: Data Source
2.5. Analyze: Data Interpretation
2.6. Formulate: Data Verification
2.7. Publish: Research Report
2.8. Repeat: Report Update
3. Executive Summary
4. Market Overview
4.1. Introduction
4.2. Structural Health Monitoring Market, by Region
5. Market Insights
5.1. Market Dynamics
5.1.1. Drivers
5.1.1.1. Huge benefits associated with structural health monitoring
5.1.1.2. Investments in structural health monitoring across various countries worldwide
5.1.1.3. Aging infrastructure and government regulations about the sustainability of structures
5.1.2. Restraints
5.1.2.1. Delayed response to the structural health monitoring in developing countries
5.1.3. Opportunities
5.1.3.1. Public-private-partnerships for infrastructure development coupled with advancements in the field of sensor technology
5.1.3.2. Advent of technologically advanced solution for structural health monitoring
5.1.4. Challenges
5.1.4.1. Complexity associated with large volumes of data processing and management
5.2. Market Segmentation Analysis
5.2.1. Component: Need of highly advanced component for the real time monitoring of structural health refining predictive maintenance analytics
5.2.2. Technology: Preference for wireless structural health systems for quick deployment or reconfiguration of more secure monitoring systems
5.2.3. Vertical: Expandable utilization in aerospace and defense of structural health monitoring for minimal interference with the operational capabilities
5.3. Market Trend Analysis
5.4. Cumulative Impact of High Inflation
5.5. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
5.5.1. Threat of New Entrants
5.5.2. Threat of Substitutes
5.5.3. Bargaining Power of Customers
5.5.4. Bargaining Power of Suppliers
5.5.5. Industry Rivalry
5.6. Value Chain & Critical Path Analysis
5.7. Regulatory Framework
6. Structural Health Monitoring Market, by Offering
6.1. Introduction
6.2. Hardware
6.3.1. Sensors
6.3.2.1. Accelerometers
6.3.2.2. Corrosion Sensors
6.3.2.3. Displacement Sensors
6.3.2.4. Inclinometers and Tiltmeters
6.3.2.5. Strain Gauges
6.3.2.6. Temperature Sensors
6.3. Services
6.4.1. Post-Installation
6.4.2. Pre-Installation
6.4. Software
7. Structural Health Monitoring Market, by Technology
7.1. Introduction
7.2. Wired Structural Health Monitoring
7.3. Wireless Structural Health Monitoring
8. Structural Health Monitoring Market, by Vertical
8.1. Introduction
8.2. Aerospace & Defence
8.3. Civil Infrastructure
8.4. Energy
8.5. Mining
9. Americas Structural Health Monitoring Market
9.1. Introduction
9.2. Argentina
9.3. Brazil
9.4. Canada
9.5. Mexico
9.6. United States
10. Asia-Pacific Structural Health Monitoring Market
10.1. Introduction
10.2. Australia
10.3. China
10.4. India
10.5. Indonesia
10.6. Japan
10.7. Malaysia
10.8. Philippines
10.9. Singapore
10.10. South Korea
10.11. Taiwan
10.12. Thailand
10.13. Vietnam
11. Europe, Middle East & Africa Structural Health Monitoring Market
11.1. Introduction
11.2. Denmark
11.3. Egypt
11.4. Finland
11.5. France
11.6. Germany
11.7. Israel
11.8. Italy
11.9. Netherlands
11.10. Nigeria
11.11. Norway
11.12. Poland
11.13. Qatar
11.14. Russia
11.15. Saudi Arabia
11.16. South Africa
11.17. Spain
11.18. Sweden
11.19. Switzerland
11.20. Turkey
11.21. United Arab Emirates
11.22. United Kingdom
12. Competitive Landscape
12.1. FPNV Positioning Matrix
12.2. Market Share Analysis, By Key Player
12.3. Competitive Scenario Analysis, By Key Player
12.3.1. Agreement, Collaboration, & Partnership
12.3.1.1. Akselos, Yinson and Enauta Sign a Multi-Year Deal in Brazil to Deploy Real-Time Structural Health Monitoring for Atlanta FPSO
12.3.2. New Product Launch & Enhancement
12.3.2.1. Arahas Unveils Groundbreaking Structural Health Monitoring and Early Warning Technology for Earthquake-Prone Regions in the Indian Subcontinent
12.3.2.2. ABS Launches Offshore Structural Health Monitoring Notation
13. Competitive Portfolio
13.1. Key Company Profiles
13.1.1. Acellent Technologies Inc.
13.1.2. AVT Reliability Ltd.
13.1.3. Beanair GmbH
13.1.4. Bridge Diagnostics
13.1.5. Campbell Scientific, Inc.
13.1.6. COWI A/S
13.1.7. Digitexx Data Systems, Inc.
13.1.8. ElastiSense
13.1.9. FEAC Engineering P.C.
13.1.10. First Sensor AG by TE Connectivity Ltd.
13.1.11. Geocomp, Inc.
13.1.12. Geokon
13.1.13. Geomotion (Singapore) Pte Ltd.
13.1.14. Hottinger Brüel & Kjaer GmbH
13.1.15. ignaGuard, LLC
13.1.16. Infibra Technologies Srl
13.1.17. James Fisher and Sons PLC
13.1.18. KDM Engineers [India] Pvt. Ltd.
13.1.19. Kinemetrics, Inc.
13.1.20. Nova Ventures Group Corp.
13.1.21. Rst Instruments Ltd.
13.1.22. Sensuron LLC
13.1.23. Setpoint Technologies Ltd.
13.1.24. SGS S.A.
13.1.25. SHM Canada Consulting Limited
13.1.26. Sisgeo Srl
13.1.27. SITES AFLA (Pty) Ltd.
13.1.28. Sixense Group
13.1.29. Sodis Lab
13.1.30. Somni Solutions
13.1.31. Xylem Inc.
13.2. Key Product Portfolio
14. Appendix
14.1. Discussion Guide
14.2. License & Pricing
FIGURE 1. STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET RESEARCH PROCESS
FIGURE 2. STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET SIZE, 2023 VS 2030
FIGURE 3. STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 4. STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2023 VS 2030 (%)
FIGURE 5. STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2023 VS 2024 VS 2030 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 6. STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET DYNAMICS
FIGURE 7. STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET SIZE, BY OFFERING, 2023 VS 2030 (%)
FIGURE 8. STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET SIZE, BY OFFERING, 2023 VS 2024 VS 2030 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 9. STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2023 VS 2030 (%)
FIGURE 10. STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2023 VS 2024 VS 2030 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 11. STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, 2023 VS 2030 (%)
FIGURE 12. STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, 2023 VS 2024 VS 2030 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 13. AMERICAS STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2023 VS 2030 (%)
FIGURE 14. AMERICAS STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2023 VS 2024 VS 2030 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 15. UNITED STATES STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET SIZE, BY STATE, 2023 VS 2030 (%)
FIGURE 16. UNITED STATES STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET SIZE, BY STATE, 2023 VS 2024 VS 2030 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 17. ASIA-PACIFIC STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2023 VS 2030 (%)
FIGURE 18. ASIA-PACIFIC STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2023 VS 2024 VS 2030 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 19. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2023 VS 2030 (%)
FIGURE 20. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2023 VS 2024 VS 2030 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 21. STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2023
FIGURE 22. STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2023

Download our eBook: How to Succeed Using Market Research

Learn how to effectively navigate the market research process to help guide your organization on the journey to success.

Download eBook
Cookie Settings