In-Vitro Toxicology Testing Market by Technology (Cell Culture Technology, High Throughput Technology, Molecular Imaging), Method (Biochemical Assay, Cellular Assay, Ex-vivo), Application, End-User Industry - Global Forecast 2024-2030


Attention: There is an updated edition available for this report.

In-Vitro Toxicology Testing Market by Technology (Cell Culture Technology, High Throughput Technology, Molecular Imaging), Method (Biochemical Assay, Cellular Assay, Ex-vivo), Application, End-User Industry - Global Forecast 2024-2030


The In-Vitro Toxicology Testing Market size was estimated at USD 12.21 billion in 2023 and expected to reach USD 13.49 billion in 2024, at a CAGR 10.90% to reach USD 25.21 billion by 2030.

Global In-Vitro Toxicology Testing MarketThe in-vitro toxicology testing market employs cell cultures and organ cultures for toxicity evaluation of substances such as chemicals, drugs, and food. This innovative approach, used in pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and the food industry, offers significant precision, repeatability, and speed benefits. The market is thriving due to advancements in testing methods, a rising ethos against animal testing, and the increased need for cost-effective safety measures. Potential growth areas lie in using in-vitro models in drug and therapeutic development, which closely mimic human biochemistry and minimize the occurrence of unsuccessful clinical trials. Further, the progress in genomics and proteomics presents considerable growth opportunities. The market, however, faces challenges such as the complexity of test data interpretation, the difficulty of replicating in-vivo conditions, and regulatory intricacies, all of which contribute to high operational costs. Future business growth hinges on focused research to enhance the predictive accuracy of in-vitro test systems while lowering costs. Collaborations with regulatory agencies for test recognition and approval advances in computational biology and genomics and innovations in 3D cell culture and organ-on-a-chip systems collectively drive market expansion, ensuring a broad consumer base is achieved while upholding consumer safety standards.Regional InsightsThe Americas, particularly the U.S., and Canada, spearheading the in vitro toxicology testing field due to high biomedical research demand from high chronic disease prevalence. Government initiatives and the robust presence of market leaders further bolster their position. Europe also leans towards in-vitro testing, with legislation including Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation, and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) law spurring investment into efficient and reliable testing methods, especially for hazard identification and risk assessment. Despite being nascent, the Middle East and Africa also demonstrate a high potential market, encouraged by the increased healthcare sector investment and the pressing need to comply with global health and safety regulations. Dynamic consumer demands in the Asia Pacific, including countries such as China, Japan, and India, propel the growth of in-vitro testing in this region. For example, China's funding for biomedical research is increasing, Japan benefits from a sturdy healthcare framework and notable pro-research policies, and healthcare investors are courting India's burgeoning economy. Global initiatives, patenting activities, and research advancements, such as the EU's Horizon 2020 project and China's National Natural Science Foundation funding, underscore the indispensable role of in-vitro toxicology testing.

FPNV Positioning Matrix

The FPNV Positioning Matrix is pivotal in evaluating the In-Vitro Toxicology Testing Market. It offers a comprehensive assessment of vendors, examining key metrics related to Business Strategy and Product Satisfaction. This in-depth analysis empowers users to make well-informed decisions aligned with their requirements. Based on the evaluation, the vendors are then categorized into four distinct quadrants representing varying levels of success: Forefront (F), Pathfinder (P), Niche (N), or Vital (V).

Market Share Analysis

The Market Share Analysis is a comprehensive tool that provides an insightful and in-depth examination of the current state of vendors in the In-Vitro Toxicology Testing Market. By meticulously comparing and analyzing vendor contributions in terms of overall revenue, customer base, and other key metrics, we can offer companies a greater understanding of their performance and the challenges they face when competing for market share. Additionally, this analysis provides valuable insights into the competitive nature of the sector, including factors such as accumulation, fragmentation dominance, and amalgamation traits observed over the base year period studied. With this expanded level of detail, vendors can make more informed decisions and devise effective strategies to gain a competitive edge in the market.

Key Company Profiles

The report delves into recent significant developments in the In-Vitro Toxicology Testing Market, highlighting leading vendors and their innovative profiles. These include Abbott Laboratories, Agilent Technologies, Inc., Becton, Dickinson and Company, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Bio-Techne Corporation, BioIVT LLC, Charles River Laboratories International, Inc., Creative Bioarray, ERBC Group, Eurofins Scientific SE, Evotec SE, F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Gentronix Limited, HD Biosciences Co., Ltd., INDIGO Biosciences, Inc., Inotiv, Inc., InSphero AG, Intertek Group PLC, Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, LAUS GmbH, LGC Limited, Merck KGaA, Microbac Laboratories Inc., Oroxcell SAS, Promega Corporation, Qiagen N.V., SGS SA, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Toxys, Inc., Vimta Labs Ltd., and WuXi AppTec.

Market Segmentation & Coverage

This research report categorizes the In-Vitro Toxicology Testing Market to forecast the revenues and analyze trends in each of the following sub-markets:

Technology
Cell Culture Technology
High Throughput Technology
Molecular Imaging
OMICS Technology
Method
Biochemical Assay
Cellular Assay
Ex-vivo
In Silico
Application
Dermal Toxicity
Endocrine Disruption
Occular Toxicity
Systemic Toxicology
End-User Industry
Chemicals
Cosmetic & Household Products
Food
Pharmaceuticals & Biopharmaceuticals
Region
Americas
Argentina
Brazil
Canada
Mexico
United States
California
Florida
Illinois
New York
Ohio
Pennsylvania
Texas
Asia-Pacific
Australia
China
India
Indonesia
Japan
Malaysia
Philippines
Singapore
South Korea
Taiwan
Thailand
Vietnam
Europe, Middle East & Africa
Denmark
Egypt
Finland
France
Germany
Israel
Italy
Netherlands
Nigeria
Norway
Poland
Qatar
Russia
Saudi Arabia
South Africa
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Turkey
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom

The report offers valuable insights on the following aspects:

1. Market Penetration: It presents comprehensive information on the market provided by key players.
2. Market Development: It delves deep into lucrative emerging markets and analyzes the penetration across mature market segments.
3. Market Diversification: It provides detailed information on new product launches, untapped geographic regions, recent developments, and investments.
4. Competitive Assessment & Intelligence: It conducts an exhaustive assessment of market shares, strategies, products, certifications, regulatory approvals, patent landscape, and manufacturing capabilities of the leading players.
5. Product Development & Innovation: It offers intelligent insights on future technologies, R&D activities, and breakthrough product developments.

The report addresses key questions such as:

1. What is the market size and forecast of the In-Vitro Toxicology Testing Market?
2. Which products, segments, applications, and areas should one consider investing in over the forecast period in the In-Vitro Toxicology Testing Market?
3. What are the technology trends and regulatory frameworks in the In-Vitro Toxicology Testing Market?
4. What is the market share of the leading vendors in the In-Vitro Toxicology Testing Market?
5. Which modes and strategic moves are suitable for entering the In-Vitro Toxicology Testing Market?

Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year


1. Preface
1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.3. Years Considered for the Study
1.4. Currency & Pricing
1.5. Language
1.6. Limitations
1.7. Assumptions
1.8. Stakeholders
2. Research Methodology
2.1. Define: Research Objective
2.2. Determine: Research Design
2.3. Prepare: Research Instrument
2.4. Collect: Data Source
2.5. Analyze: Data Interpretation
2.6. Formulate: Data Verification
2.7. Publish: Research Report
2.8. Repeat: Report Update
3. Executive Summary
4. Market Overview
4.1. Introduction
4.2. In-Vitro Toxicology Testing Market, by Region
5. Market Insights
5.1. Market Dynamics
5.1.1. Drivers
5.1.1.1. R&D initiatives for drug discovery and launch of novel agrochemicals and food additives
5.1.1.2. Utilization of in-vitro toxicology testing for evaluation of medical devices
5.1.2. Restraints
5.1.2.1. Technical limitations and inability to accurately replicate certain biological phenomena
5.1.3. Opportunities
5.1.3.1. Advancements in in-vitro toxicology testing and adoption of computational biology for analyzing toxicology data
5.1.3.2. Government programs to promote cruelty-free testing methods and develop novel toxicology assays
5.1.4. Challenges
5.1.4.1. Chances of drug approval failures with the current models.
5.2. Market Segmentation Analysis
5.2.1. Technology: Preference for in-vitro toxicology testing technology selection largely depends by specific research needs
5.2.2. Method: Cellular assays gained importance in toxicity, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in vitro toxicology testing
5.2.3. Application: Rising focus on improving testing methods while delivering accurate, reliable results catering to industry-specific requirements
5.2.4. End-Use: In vitro testing used vigorously in food and pharma sectors to ensure safety standards
5.3. Market Trend Analysis
5.4. Cumulative Impact of High Inflation
5.5. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
5.5.1. Threat of New Entrants
5.5.2. Threat of Substitutes
5.5.3. Bargaining Power of Customers
5.5.4. Bargaining Power of Suppliers
5.5.5. Industry Rivalry
5.6. Value Chain & Critical Path Analysis
5.7. Regulatory Framework
6. In-Vitro Toxicology Testing Market, by Technology
6.1. Introduction
6.2. Cell Culture Technology
6.3. High Throughput Technology
6.4. Molecular Imaging
6.5. OMICS Technology
7. In-Vitro Toxicology Testing Market, by Method
7.1. Introduction
7.2. Biochemical Assay
7.3. Cellular Assay
7.4. Ex-vivo
7.5. In Silico
8. In-Vitro Toxicology Testing Market, by Application
8.1. Introduction
8.2. Dermal Toxicity
8.3. Endocrine Disruption
8.4. Occular Toxicity
8.5. Systemic Toxicology
9. In-Vitro Toxicology Testing Market, by End-User Industry
9.1. Introduction
9.2. Chemicals
9.3. Cosmetic & Household Products
9.4. Food
9.5. Pharmaceuticals & Biopharmaceuticals
10. Americas In-Vitro Toxicology Testing Market
10.1. Introduction
10.2. Argentina
10.3. Brazil
10.4. Canada
10.5. Mexico
10.6. United States
11. Asia-Pacific In-Vitro Toxicology Testing Market
11.1. Introduction
11.2. Australia
11.3. China
11.4. India
11.5. Indonesia
11.6. Japan
11.7. Malaysia
11.8. Philippines
11.9. Singapore
11.10. South Korea
11.11. Taiwan
11.12. Thailand
11.13. Vietnam
12. Europe, Middle East & Africa In-Vitro Toxicology Testing Market
12.1. Introduction
12.2. Denmark
12.3. Egypt
12.4. Finland
12.5. France
12.6. Germany
12.7. Israel
12.8. Italy
12.9. Netherlands
12.10. Nigeria
12.11. Norway
12.12. Poland
12.13. Qatar
12.14. Russia
12.15. Saudi Arabia
12.16. South Africa
12.17. Spain
12.18. Sweden
12.19. Switzerland
12.20. Turkey
12.21. United Arab Emirates
12.22. United Kingdom
13. Competitive Landscape
13.1. FPNV Positioning Matrix
13.2. Market Share Analysis, By Key Player
13.3. Competitive Scenario Analysis, By Key Player
13.3.1. Merger & Acquisition
13.3.1.1. LGC Clinical Diagnostics Acquires QC Product Maker Kova International
13.3.1.2. ERBC Group Extends its Preclinical Expertise with the Acquisition of Oncofactory
13.3.2. Agreement, Collaboration, & Partnership
13.3.2.1. IIVS and Toxys Entered into an Agreement to Offer ToxTracker for In-Vitro Genetic Toxicity Evaluation
14. Competitive Portfolio
14.1. Key Company Profiles
14.1.1. Abbott Laboratories
14.1.2. Agilent Technologies, Inc.
14.1.3. Becton, Dickinson and Company
14.1.4. Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
14.1.5. Bio-Techne Corporation
14.1.6. BioIVT LLC
14.1.7. Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
14.1.8. Creative Bioarray
14.1.9. ERBC Group
14.1.10. Eurofins Scientific SE
14.1.11. Evotec SE
14.1.12. F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG
14.1.13. Gentronix Limited
14.1.14. HD Biosciences Co., Ltd.
14.1.15. INDIGO Biosciences, Inc.
14.1.16. Inotiv, Inc.
14.1.17. InSphero AG
14.1.18. Intertek Group PLC
14.1.19. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings
14.1.20. LAUS GmbH
14.1.21. LGC Limited
14.1.22. Merck KGaA
14.1.23. Microbac Laboratories Inc.
14.1.24. Oroxcell SAS
14.1.25. Promega Corporation
14.1.26. Qiagen N.V.
14.1.27. SGS SA
14.1.28. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
14.1.29. Toxys, Inc.
14.1.30. Vimta Labs Ltd.
14.1.31. WuXi AppTec
14.2. Key Product Portfolio
15. Appendix
15.1. Discussion Guide
15.2. License & Pricing
FIGURE 1. IN-VITRO TOXICOLOGY TESTING MARKET RESEARCH PROCESS
FIGURE 2. IN-VITRO TOXICOLOGY TESTING MARKET SIZE, 2023 VS 2030
FIGURE 3. IN-VITRO TOXICOLOGY TESTING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 4. IN-VITRO TOXICOLOGY TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2023 VS 2030 (%)
FIGURE 5. IN-VITRO TOXICOLOGY TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2023 VS 2024 VS 2030 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 6. IN-VITRO TOXICOLOGY TESTING MARKET DYNAMICS
FIGURE 7. IN-VITRO TOXICOLOGY TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2023 VS 2030 (%)
FIGURE 8. IN-VITRO TOXICOLOGY TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2023 VS 2024 VS 2030 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 9. IN-VITRO TOXICOLOGY TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY METHOD, 2023 VS 2030 (%)
FIGURE 10. IN-VITRO TOXICOLOGY TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY METHOD, 2023 VS 2024 VS 2030 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 11. IN-VITRO TOXICOLOGY TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2023 VS 2030 (%)
FIGURE 12. IN-VITRO TOXICOLOGY TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2023 VS 2024 VS 2030 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 13. IN-VITRO TOXICOLOGY TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2023 VS 2030 (%)
FIGURE 14. IN-VITRO TOXICOLOGY TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2023 VS 2024 VS 2030 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 15. AMERICAS IN-VITRO TOXICOLOGY TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2023 VS 2030 (%)
FIGURE 16. AMERICAS IN-VITRO TOXICOLOGY TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2023 VS 2024 VS 2030 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 17. UNITED STATES IN-VITRO TOXICOLOGY TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY STATE, 2023 VS 2030 (%)
FIGURE 18. UNITED STATES IN-VITRO TOXICOLOGY TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY STATE, 2023 VS 2024 VS 2030 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 19. ASIA-PACIFIC IN-VITRO TOXICOLOGY TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2023 VS 2030 (%)
FIGURE 20. ASIA-PACIFIC IN-VITRO TOXICOLOGY TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2023 VS 2024 VS 2030 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 21. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA IN-VITRO TOXICOLOGY TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2023 VS 2030 (%)
FIGURE 22. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA IN-VITRO TOXICOLOGY TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2023 VS 2024 VS 2030 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 23. IN-VITRO TOXICOLOGY TESTING MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2023
FIGURE 24. IN-VITRO TOXICOLOGY TESTING MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2023

Download our eBook: How to Succeed Using Market Research

Learn how to effectively navigate the market research process to help guide your organization on the journey to success.

Download eBook
Cookie Settings